BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33884572)

  • 1. Rethinking the McGurk effect as a perceptual illusion.
    Getz LM; Toscano JC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2583-2598. PubMed ID: 33884572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y; Senkowski D; Keil J
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual uncertainty explains activation differences between audiovisual congruent speech and McGurk stimuli.
    Dong C; Noppeney U; Wang S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2024 Mar; 45(4):e26653. PubMed ID: 38488460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacognition in the audiovisual McGurk illusion: perceptual and causal confidence.
    Meijer D; Noppeney U
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Sep; 378(1886):20220348. PubMed ID: 37545307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
    Van Engen KJ; Dey A; Sommers MS; Peelle JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Weak observer-level correlation and strong stimulus-level correlation between the McGurk effect and audiovisual speech-in-noise: A causal inference explanation.
    Magnotti JF; Dzeda KB; Wegner-Clemens K; Rennig J; Beauchamp MS
    Cortex; 2020 Dec; 133():371-383. PubMed ID: 33221701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
    Mallick DB; Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theta oscillations reflect conflict processing in the perception of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Torralba M; Soto-Faraco S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 48(7):2630-2641. PubMed ID: 29250857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Motor Network Reduces Multisensory Illusory Perception.
    Murakami T; Abe M; Wiratman W; Fujiwara J; Okamoto M; Mizuochi-Endo T; Iwabuchi T; Makuuchi M; Yamashita A; Tiksnadi A; Chang FY; Kubo H; Matsuda N; Kobayashi S; Eifuku S; Ugawa Y
    J Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 38(45):9679-9688. PubMed ID: 30249803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?
    Brown VA; Hedayati M; Zanger A; Mayn S; Ray L; Dillman-Hasso N; Strand JF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207160. PubMed ID: 30418995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-related hearing loss influences functional connectivity of auditory cortex for the McGurk illusion.
    Rosemann S; Smith D; Dewenter M; Thiel CM
    Cortex; 2020 Aug; 129():266-280. PubMed ID: 32535378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian binding and fusion models explain illusion and enhancement effects in audiovisual speech perception.
    Lindborg A; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246986. PubMed ID: 33606815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visually biased Perception in Cochlear Implant Users: A Study of the McGurk and Sound-Induced Flash Illusions.
    Butera IM; Stevenson RA; Gifford RH; Wallace MT
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221076681. PubMed ID: 37377212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How prior expectations shape multisensory perception.
    Gau R; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):876-886. PubMed ID: 26419391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion.
    Nath AR; Beauchamp MS
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):781-7. PubMed ID: 21787869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual integration in the McGurk effect is impervious to music training.
    Lee HH; Groves K; Ripollés P; Carrasco M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3262. PubMed ID: 38332159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.