These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33884572)

  • 21. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Impact of Singing on Visual and Multisensory Speech Perception in Children on the Autism Spectrum.
    Feldman JI; Tu A; Conrad JG; Kuang W; Santapuram P; Woynaroski TG
    Multisens Res; 2022 Dec; 36(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 36731528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A; Baart M; Stekelenburg JJ; Vroomen J; Andersen TS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA; Strand JF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Deconstructing the McGurk-MacDonald illusion.
    Soto-Faraco S; Alsius A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):580-7. PubMed ID: 19331510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When eyes beat lips: speaker gaze affects audiovisual integration in the McGurk illusion.
    Wahn B; Schmitz L; Kingstone A; Böckler-Raettig A
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1930-1943. PubMed ID: 34854983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Audiovisual speech integration does not rely on the motor system: evidence from articulatory suppression, the McGurk effect, and fMRI.
    Matchin W; Groulx K; Hickok G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):606-20. PubMed ID: 24236768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The noisy encoding of disparity model of the McGurk effect.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 25245268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
    Gurler D; Doyle N; Walker E; Magnotti J; Beauchamp M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The noisy encoding of disparity model predicts perception of the McGurk effect in native Japanese speakers.
    Magnotti JF; Lado A; Beauchamp MS
    Front Neurosci; 2024; 18():1421713. PubMed ID: 38988770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The temporal binding window for audiovisual speech: Children are like little adults.
    Hillock-Dunn A; Grantham DW; Wallace MT
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 88():74-82. PubMed ID: 26920938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Audiovisual integration of speech in a bistable illusion.
    Munhall KG; ten Hove MW; Brammer M; Paré M
    Curr Biol; 2009 May; 19(9):735-9. PubMed ID: 19345097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining the McGurk illusion using high-field 7 Tesla functional MRI.
    Szycik GR; Stadler J; Tempelmann C; Münte TF
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():95. PubMed ID: 22529797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Differences in audiovisual integration, as measured by McGurk phenomenon, among adult and adolescent patients with schizophrenia and age-matched healthy control groups.
    Pearl D; Yodashkin-Porat D; Katz N; Valevski A; Aizenberg D; Sigler M; Weizman A; Kikinzon L
    Compr Psychiatry; 2009; 50(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19216897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory-visual integration during nonconscious perception.
    Ching ASM; Kim J; Davis C
    Cortex; 2019 Aug; 117():1-15. PubMed ID: 30925308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of infant bilingualism on audiovisual integration in a McGurk task.
    Mercure E; Bright P; Quiroz I; Filippi R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 May; 217():105351. PubMed ID: 35093667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reducing Playback Rate of Audiovisual Speech Leads to a Surprising Decrease in the McGurk Effect.
    Magnotti JF; Basu Mallick D; Beauchamp MS
    Multisens Res; 2018 Jan; 31(1-2):19-38. PubMed ID: 31264598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. McGurk illusion recalibrates subsequent auditory perception.
    Lüttke CS; Ekman M; van Gerven MA; de Lange FP
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32891. PubMed ID: 27611960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Motor Circuit and Superior Temporal Sulcus Activities Linked to Individual Differences in Multisensory Speech Perception.
    Li L; Li R; Huang X; Shen F; Wang H; Wang X; Deng C; Wang C; Yang J; Zhang L; Li J; Zou T; Chen H
    Brain Topogr; 2021 Nov; 34(6):779-792. PubMed ID: 34480635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.