These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33884580)

  • 1. Comparing the performance of first-order conditional estimation (FOCE) and different expectation-maximization (EM) methods in NONMEM: real data experience with complex nonlinear parent-metabolite pharmacokinetic model.
    Bach T; An G
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2021 Aug; 48(4):581-595. PubMed ID: 33884580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the performance of FOCE and different expectation-maximization methods in handling complex population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
    Liu X; Wang Y
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Aug; 43(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 27215925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Nonmem 7.2 estimation methods and parallel processing efficiency on a target-mediated drug disposition model.
    Gibiansky L; Gibiansky E; Bauer R
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Feb; 39(1):17-35. PubMed ID: 22101761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fisher information matrix for nonlinear mixed effects multiple response models: evaluation of the appropriateness of the first order linearization using a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.
    Bazzoli C; Retout S; Mentré F
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1940-56. PubMed ID: 19266541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance comparison of first-order conditional estimation with interaction and Bayesian estimation methods for estimating the population parameters and its distribution from data sets with a low number of subjects.
    Pradhan S; Song B; Lee J; Chae JW; Kim KI; Back HM; Han N; Kwon KI; Yun HY
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):154. PubMed ID: 29191177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of FOCEI and SAEM Estimation Methods in Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using NONMEM
    Sukarnjanaset W; Wattanavijitkul T; Jarurattanasirikul S
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2018 Dec; 43(6):729-736. PubMed ID: 29785609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance comparison of various maximum likelihood nonlinear mixed-effects estimation methods for dose-response models.
    Plan EL; Maloney A; Mentré F; Karlsson MO; Bertrand J
    AAPS J; 2012 Sep; 14(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 22528503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using sensitivity equations for computing gradients of the FOCE and FOCEI approximations to the population likelihood.
    Almquist J; Leander J; Jirstrand M
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2015 Jun; 42(3):191-209. PubMed ID: 25801663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of the glucose minimal model by stochastic nonlinear-mixed effects methods.
    Largajolli A; Bertoldo A; Cobelli C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5482-5. PubMed ID: 23367170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A fast method for testing covariates in population PK/PD Models.
    Khandelwal A; Harling K; Jonsson EN; Hooker AC; Karlsson MO
    AAPS J; 2011 Sep; 13(3):464-72. PubMed ID: 21725709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of bias, precision, robustness and runtime for estimation methods in NONMEM 7.
    Johansson ÅM; Ueckert S; Plan EL; Hooker AC; Karlsson MO
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2014 Jun; 41(3):223-38. PubMed ID: 24801864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the nonparametric estimation method in NONMEM VI.
    Savic RM; Kjellsson MC; Karlsson MO
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Apr; 37(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19159684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extension of the SAEM algorithm for nonlinear mixed models with 2 levels of random effects.
    Panhard X; Samson A
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):121-35. PubMed ID: 18583352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nonlinearity detection: advantages of nonlinear mixed-effects modeling.
    Jonsson EN; Wade JR; Karlsson MO
    AAPS PharmSci; 2000; 2(3):E32. PubMed ID: 11741248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of the nlmixr R package for population pharmacokinetic modeling: A metformin case study.
    Mak WY; Ooi QX; Cruz CV; Looi I; Yuen KH; Standing JF
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2023 Jan; 89(1):330-339. PubMed ID: 35976674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Derivation of various NONMEM estimation methods.
    Wang Y
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Oct; 34(5):575-93. PubMed ID: 17620001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of uncertainty parameters estimated by different population PK software and methods.
    Dartois C; Lemenuel-Diot A; Laveille C; Tranchand B; Tod M; Girard P
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2007 Jun; 34(3):289-311. PubMed ID: 17216368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditional weighted residuals (CWRES): a model diagnostic for the FOCE method.
    Hooker AC; Staatz CE; Karlsson MO
    Pharm Res; 2007 Dec; 24(12):2187-97. PubMed ID: 17612795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of the SAEM and FOCEI Algorithms in the Open-Source, Nonlinear Mixed Effect Modeling Tool nlmixr.
    Schoemaker R; Fidler M; Laveille C; Wilkins JJ; Hooijmaijers R; Post TM; Trame MN; Xiong Y; Wang W
    CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol; 2019 Dec; 8(12):923-930. PubMed ID: 31654482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.