These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3388479)

  • 1. Discrepancies in reverse ABO typing due to prozone. How safe is the immediate-spin crossmatch?
    Judd WJ; Steiner EA; O'Donnell DB; Oberman HA
    Transfusion; 1988; 28(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 3388479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of delayed centrifugation or reading on the detection of ABO incompatibility by the immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Shulman IA; Calderón C
    Transfusion; 1991; 31(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 2003320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is a room-temperature crossmatch necessary for the detection of ABO errors?
    Trudeau LR; Judd WJ; Butch SH; Oberman HA
    Transfusion; 1983; 23(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 6679378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anti-i causing acute hemolysis following a negative immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Abruzzo LV; Davenport RD; Oberman HA; Pehta JC; Nance SJ
    Transfusion; 1992; 32(6):572-5. PubMed ID: 1502712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an automated microplate technique in the Galileo system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping.
    Xu W; Wan F; Lou Y; Jin J; Mao W
    Clin Lab; 2014; 60(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 24660536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limitations of the immediate spin crossmatch when used for detecting ABO incompatibility.
    Berry-Dortch S; Woodside CH; Boral LI
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(2):176-8. PubMed ID: 3984013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The sensitivity and specificity of the immediate-spin crossmatch.
    Meyer EA; Shulman IA
    Transfusion; 1989 Feb; 29(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 2919433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The gel test: some problems and solutions.
    de Figueiredo M; Lima M; Morais S; Porto G; Justiça B
    Transfus Med; 1992 Jun; 2(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 1308208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the gel system for ABO grouping and D typing.
    Langston MM; Procter JL; Cipolone KM; Stroncek DF
    Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 10204594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions following antibody screening and immediate-spin crossmatching.
    Pinkerton PH; Coovadia AS; Goldstein J
    Transfusion; 1992; 32(9):814-7. PubMed ID: 1471244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations of the crossmatch for detection of incompatibility between A2B red blood cells and B patient sera.
    Lamberson RD; Boral LI; Berry-Dortch S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Oct; 86(4):511-3. PubMed ID: 3766464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experience with the routine use of an abbreviated crossmatch.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Saxena S; Thompson JC; Okamoto M; Kent DR; Nakayama RK
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Aug; 82(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 6465079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of anti-A in neonatal serum.
    Mintz PD; Anderson G
    Transfusion; 1991 Sep; 31(7):631-2. PubMed ID: 1891792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Flow Cytometric Study of Reagent Cells to Resolve ABO Typing Discrepancy.
    Maracaja DLV; Qiao J; Salazar T; Barry J; LaForce K; Holder K; Olson JD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Jan; 155(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 33049048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invalidation of antiglobulin tests by a high thermal amplitude cryoglobulin.
    Ylagen ES; Curtis BR; Wildgen ME; Mass MD; Chaplin H
    Transfusion; 1990 Feb; 30(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 2305443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indirect antiglobulin test-crossmatch using low-ionic-strength saline-albumin enhancement medium and reduced incubation time: effectiveness in the detection of most clinically significant antibodies and impact on blood utilization.
    Dinardo CL; Bonifácio SL; Mendrone A
    Immunohematology; 2014; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25238242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limitations of Polybrene to detect ABO incompatibility.
    Mintz PD; Anderson G
    Vox Sang; 1986; 51(4):318-20. PubMed ID: 3798865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can the reading for serologic reactivity following 37 degrees C incubation be omitted?
    Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Oberman HA; Nance SJ
    Transfusion; 1992 May; 32(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 1585433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: the computer crossmatch.
    Butch SH; Judd WJ; Steiner EA; Stoe M; Oberman HA
    Transfusion; 1994 Feb; 34(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 8310478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Solid-phase ABO grouping and Rh typing.
    Sinor LT; Rachel JM; Beck ML; Bayer WL; Coenen WM; Plapp FV
    Transfusion; 1985; 25(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 3918360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.