BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33885261)

  • 1. Development and Validation of the Spanish AzBio Sentence Corpus.
    Rivas A; Perkins E; Rivas A; Rincon LA; Litvak L; Spahr T; Dorman M; Kessler D; Gifford R
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):154-158. PubMed ID: 33885261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Cook SJ; Loiselle LM; DeJong MD; Hedley-Williams A; Sunderhaus LS; Hayes CA; Gifford RH
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 24658601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists.
    Spahr AJ; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Van Wie S; Gifford RH; Loizou PC; Loiselle LM; Oakes T; Cook S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 21829134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.
    Faulkner KF; Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):582-94. PubMed ID: 26134725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of TIMIT sentence list equivalency with adult cochlear implant recipients.
    King SE; Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK; Strube M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):313-31. PubMed ID: 22533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of list equivalency for Mandarin speech materials to use with cochlear implant listeners.
    Li Y; Wang S; Su Q; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S31-S40. PubMed ID: 27414242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. AzBio Sentence test in Hebrew (HeBio): development, preliminary validation, and the effect of noise.
    Taitelbaum-Swead R; Dahan T; Katzenel U; Dorman MF; Litvak LM; Fostick L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Sep; 23(5):270-279. PubMed ID: 35672886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of the FrBio, an international French adaptation of the AzBio sentence lists.
    Bergeron F; Berland A; Fitzpatrick EM; Vincent C; Giasson A; Leung Kam K; Chafiq W; Fanouillère T; Demers D
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):510-515. PubMed ID: 31074295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and Evaluation of a Language-Independent Test of Auditory Discrimination for Referrals for Cochlear Implant Candidacy Assessment.
    Ching TYC; Dillon H; Hou S; Seeto M; Sodan A; Chong-White N
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 34812793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and Validation of a Mandarin Chinese Adaptation of AzBio Sentence Test (CMnBio).
    Xi X; Wang Y; Shi Y; Gao R; Li S; Qiu X; Wang Q; Xu L
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221134007. PubMed ID: 36303434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The French MBAA2 sentence recognition in noise test for cochlear implant users.
    James CJ; Laborde ML; Algans C; Tartayre M; Cochard N; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Marx M; Karoui C
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):304-311. PubMed ID: 35290165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Discrimination Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients by Primary Language and Bilingual Hispanic Patients.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Peña S; Misztal C; Goncalves S; Ma R; Angeli S; Telischi F; Holcomb M; Dinh CT
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Jan; 170(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 37622538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Single-sided Deaf Listeners After Cochlear Implantation.
    Zeitler DM; Dorman MF; Natale SJ; Loiselle L; Yost WA; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1467-71. PubMed ID: 26375967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.