These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33885267)

  • 1. Effectiveness of Place-based Mapping in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Devices.
    Dillon MT; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J; O'Connell BP
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 33885267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Dillon MT; O'Connell BP; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Hopfinger J
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Jun; 31(2):322-337. PubMed ID: 35394798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Johnson AD; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch: Characterizing Variability and the Influence on Speech Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1349-1361. PubMed ID: 32205726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the Frequency-to-Place Function on Recognition with Place-Based Cochlear Implant Maps.
    Dillon MT; Helpard L; Brown KD; Selleck AM; Richter ME; Rooth MA; Thompson NJ; Dedmon MM; Ladak HM; Agrawal S
    Laryngoscope; 2023 Dec; 133(12):3540-3547. PubMed ID: 37078508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Electric Frequency-to-Place Mismatches on the Early Speech Recognition Outcomes for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users.
    Dillon MT; Canfarotta MW; Buss E; Rooth MA; Richter ME; Overton AB; Roth NE; Dillon SM; Raymond JH; Young A; Pearson AC; Davis AG; Dedmon MM; Brown KD; O'Connell BP
    Am J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 32(1):251-260. PubMed ID: 36800505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the Configuration of Hearing Loss on Consonant Perception between Simulated Bimodal and Electric Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Whitaker G; Lee YS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):521-527. PubMed ID: 34965598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions Between Slopes of Residual Hearing and Frequency Maps in Simulated Bimodal and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Hearing.
    Yoon YS; Straw S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 67(1):282-295. PubMed ID: 38092067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear implant spectral bandwidth for optimizing electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
    Gifford RH; Sunderhaus LW; Dawant BM; Labadie RF; Noble JH
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec; 426():108584. PubMed ID: 35985964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence of Cochlear Implant Electrode Contacts in the Functional Acoustic Hearing Region and the Influence on Speech Recognition with Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Nix EP; Thompson NJ; Brown KD; Dedmon MM; Selleck AM; Overton AB; Canfarotta MW; Dillon MT
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Dec; 44(10):1004-1010. PubMed ID: 37758328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
    Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chronic Electro-Acoustic Stimulation May Interfere With Electric Threshold Recovery After Cochlear Implantation in the Aged Guinea Pig.
    Reiss LAJ; Lawrence MB; Omelchenko IA; He W; Kirk JR
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1554-1567. PubMed ID: 38992863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
    Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.