These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3388599)

  • 1. [Should cervical cytological smears be taken with cotton swabs or a brush?].
    Glenthøj A; Rank F; Peen U; Bostofte E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1988 Jul; 150(28):1736-8. PubMed ID: 3388599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB; Arentz NP
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab for Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Rivlin ME; Woodliff JM; Bowlin RB; Moore JL; Martin RW; Grossman JH; Morrison JC
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Feb; 38(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 8445608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endocervical brush versus cotton swab for obtaining cervical smears at a clinic. A cost comparison.
    Harrison DD; Hernandez E; Dunton CJ
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Apr; 38(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 8501736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cleaning improves Pap smear quality.
    Kotaska AJ; Matisic JP
    CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(7):666-9. PubMed ID: 14517124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?
    Kivlahan C; Ingram E
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrospective evaluation of cervical smears in women harbouring biopsy proven SIL.
    Grabowska H; Nordesjö LO; Matuszkiewicz L
    Pol J Pathol; 1998; 49(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 9810175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies.
    Chakrabarti S; Guijon FB; Paraskevas M
    Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 8191818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of direct cytological smears in the ambulatory examination of the state of the endometrium].
    Ruśkiewicz D
    Patol Pol; 1983; 34(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 6888977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Acceptable quality cervical cytology taking: comparison of Cervex-brush and Cervex-mex methods].
    Ojeda Ortiz J; Muñoz Molina R; Pardo López M; Guevara Cruz M; Hernández Quijano T; Valencia Elizondo C; Hernández Valencia M
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Jul; 76(7):381-5. PubMed ID: 18798438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical and vaginal cytologic smears suggestive of adenocarcinoma.
    Pretorius R; Binstock M; Sadeghi M; Hodges W
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8829059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A rapid screening method for routine female genital tract swabs.
    Glaister D; Collins S
    Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jul; 46(3):268-9. PubMed ID: 2691802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Histopathological verification of the cervical pap smears based on material of the obstetrical-gynecological department of the provincial hospital in Kielce].
    Starzewski J; Góźdź S; Polak G; Piasek G; Laskawska M; Anisiewicz A; Adamczyk K
    Wiad Lek; 1999; 52(3-4):158-63. PubMed ID: 10499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The diagnostic value of cervical cytological investigation in gynecology].
    Faber AE; Jacobsen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1973 Nov; 135(45):2441-4. PubMed ID: 4773725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
    Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of cervical smears at King Hussein Medical Centre, Jordan, over three and a half years.
    Malkawi SR; Abu Hazeem RM; Hajjat BM; Hajjiri FK
    East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):676-9. PubMed ID: 16335662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.