These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33886630)

  • 1. The retention benefits of cumulative versus non-cumulative midterms in introductory biology may depend on students' reasoning skills.
    Bailey EG; Greenall RF; Tullis MM; Williams KR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250143. PubMed ID: 33886630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of learning gains associated with independent exam analysis in introductory biology.
    Williams AE; Aguilar-Roca NM; Tsai M; Wong M; Beaupré MM; O'Dowd DK
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 22135369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.
    Leight H; Saunders C; Calkins R; Withers M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 23222835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.
    Crossgrove K; Curran KL
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2008; 7(1):146-54. PubMed ID: 18316817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple-choice exams: an obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes.
    Stanger-Hall KF
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2012; 11(3):294-306. PubMed ID: 22949426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weekly Formative Exams and Creative Grading Enhance Student Learning in an Introductory Biology Course.
    Bailey EG; Jensen J; Nelson J; Wiberg HK; Bell JD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28130269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating quantitative thinking into an introductory biology course improves students' mathematical reasoning in biological contexts.
    Hester S; Buxner S; Elfring L; Nagy L
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2014; 13(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 24591504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participation in Voluntary Re-quizzing Is Predictive of Increased Performance on Cumulative Assessments in Introductory Biology.
    Walck-Shannon EM; Cahill MJ; McDaniel MA; Frey RF
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar15. PubMed ID: 31025914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing.
    Cortright RN; Collins HL; Rodenbaugh DW; DiCarlo SE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2003 Dec; 27(1-4):102-8. PubMed ID: 12928319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Graduate Student-Led Intervention on Study Habits and Performance in Introductory Biology.
    Hoskins TD; Gantz JD; Chaffee BR; Arlinghaus K; Wiebler J; Hughes M; Fernandes JJ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28747353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbal final exam in introductory biology yields gains in student content knowledge and longitudinal performance.
    Luckie DB; Rivkin AM; Aubry JR; Marengo BJ; Creech LR; Sweeder RD
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):515-29. PubMed ID: 24006399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opportunities for Self-Evaluation Increase Student Calibration in an Introductory Biology Course.
    Osterhage JL; Usher EL; Douin TA; Bailey WM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2019 Jun; 18(2):ar16. PubMed ID: 31025916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of weekly multicourse collective exams on pharmacy student academic behaviors and learning in an integrated biological sciences course.
    Dirks-Naylor AJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2021 Sep; 45(3):575-579. PubMed ID: 34379486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
    Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning Introductory Biology: Students' Concept-Building Approaches Predict Transfer on Biology Exams.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Frey RF; Limeri LB; Lemons PP
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2022 Dec; 21(4):ar65. PubMed ID: 36112624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does a sudden shift of testing format from closed-book to open-book change the characteristics of test scores on summative final exams?
    Cor MK; Brocks DR
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2021 Sep; 13(9):1174-1179. PubMed ID: 34330396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of a knowledge survey as an indicator of student learning in an introductory biology course.
    Bowers N; Brandon M; Hill CD
    Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 16341258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of the peer-led team-learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory.
    Snyder JJ; Carter BE; Wiles JR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015 Mar; 14(1):ar2. PubMed ID: 25673354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing student success using online quizzing in introductory (majors) biology.
    Orr R; Foster S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 24006398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.