These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33888268)
1. Optimizing Impedance Change Measurement During Radiofrequency Ablation Enables More Accurate Characterization of Lesion Formation. Qian PC; Nguyen DM; Barry MA; Tran V; Lu J; Thiagalingam A; Thomas SP; McEwan A JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 Apr; 7(4):471-481. PubMed ID: 33888268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transmembraneous irrigation of multipolar radiofrequency ablation catheters: induction of linear lesions encircling the pulmonary vein ostium without the risk of coagulum formation? Weiss C; Stewart M; Franzen O; Rostock T; Becker J; Skarda JR; Meinertz T; Willems S J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 10(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 15133356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Larger and deeper ventricular lesions using a novel expandable spherical monopolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter. Kitamura T; Hocini M; Bourier F; Martin R; Takigawa M; Frontera A; Thompson N; Cheniti G; Vlachos K; Martin CA; Lam A; Duchateau J; Pambrun T; Denis A; Sacher F; Derval N; Cochet H; Haïssaguerre M; Jaïs P J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1644-1651. PubMed ID: 31347223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of radiofrequency ablation lesion formation using a novel temperature sensing technology incorporated in a force sensing catheter. Rozen G; Ptaszek L; Zilberman I; Cordaro K; Heist EK; Beeckler C; Altmann A; Ying Z; Liu Z; Ruskin JN; Govari A; Mansour M Heart Rhythm; 2017 Feb; 14(2):248-254. PubMed ID: 28104089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circuit Impedance Could Be a Crucial Factor Influencing Radiofrequency Ablation Efficacy and Safety: A Myocardial Phantom Study of the Problem and its Correction. Bhaskaran A; Barry MA; Pouliopoulos J; Nalliah C; Qian P; Chik W; Thavapalachandran S; Davis L; McEwan A; Thomas S; Kovoor P; Thiagalingam A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 26648095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biophysics of radiofrequency ablation using an irrigated electrode. Demazumder D; Mirotznik MS; Schwartzman D J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 5(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 11752906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiofrequency ablation lesions in low-, intermediate-, and normal-voltage myocardium: an in vivo study in a porcine heart model. Tofig BJ; Lukac P; Nielsen JM; Hansen ESS; Tougaard RS; Jensen HK; Nielsen JC; Kristiansen SB Europace; 2019 Dec; 21(12):1919-1927. PubMed ID: 31545375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Nakagawa H; Yamanashi WS; Pitha JV; Arruda M; Wang X; Ohtomo K; Beckman KJ; McClelland JH; Lazzara R; Jackman WM Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2264-73. PubMed ID: 7697856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiofrequency catheter ablation using long coiled electrodes: impact of irrigation on lesion dimensions and incidence of coagulum formation. Weiss C; Antz M; Thuneke F; Meinertz T; Kuck KH; Willems S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Jun; 24(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 11449588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Irrigated Needle Ablation Creates Larger and More Transmural Ventricular Lesions Compared With Standard Unipolar Ablation in an Ovine Model. Berte B; Cochet H; Magat J; Naulin J; Ghidoli D; Pillois X; Casassus F; Yamashita S; Mahida S; Derval N; Hocini M; Quesson B; Bernus O; Weerasooriya R; Haïssaguerre M; Sacher F; Jaïs P Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2015 Dec; 8(6):1498-506. PubMed ID: 26359480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial impedance decrease as an indicator of good catheter contact: insights from radiofrequency ablation with force sensing catheters. Reichlin T; Knecht S; Lane C; Kühne M; Nof E; Chopra N; Tadros TM; Reddy VY; Schaer B; John RM; Osswald S; Stevenson WG; Sticherling C; Michaud GF Heart Rhythm; 2014 Feb; 11(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24177370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limitations of Baseline Impedance, Impedance Drop and Current for Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Monitoring: Insights from In silico Modeling. Irastorza RM; Maher T; Barkagan M; Liubasuskas R; Pérez JJ; Berjano E; d'Avila A J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2022 Oct; 9(10):. PubMed ID: 36286288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of irrigated electrode designs for radiofrequency ablation of myocardium. Demazumder D; Mirotznik MS; Schwartzman D J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2001 Dec; 5(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 11752907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of catheter contact force during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model using a force-sensing catheter. Thiagalingam A; D'Avila A; Foley L; Guerrero JL; Lambert H; Leo G; Ruskin JN; Reddy VY J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Jul; 21(7):806-11. PubMed ID: 20132400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of ventricular radiofrequency lesions in sheep using standard irrigated tip catheter versus catheter ablation enabling direct visualization. Sacher F; Derval N; Jadidi A; Scherr D; Hocini M; Haissaguerre M; Dos Santos P; Jais P J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 23(8):869-73. PubMed ID: 22554117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of delivering high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions utilizing a novel temperature sensing technology. Rozen G; Ptaszek LM; Zilberman I; Douglas V; Heist EK; Beeckler C; Altmann A; Ruskin JN; Govari A; Mansour M Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(FI_3):f444-f450. PubMed ID: 29579196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observations on Attenuation of Local Electrogram Amplitude and Circuit Impedance During Atrial Radiofrequency Ablation: An In vivo Investigation Using a Novel Direct Endocardial Visualization Catheter. Bhaskaran A; Chik W; Nalliah C; Pouliopoulos J; Barry T; Nguyen DT; Midekin C; Samanta R; Farraha M; Thomas S; Kovoor P; Thiagalingam A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1250-1256. PubMed ID: 26249709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In Vitro Validation of the Lesion Size Index to Predict Lesion Width and Depth After Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Model. Calzolari V; De Mattia L; Indiani S; Crosato M; Furlanetto A; Licciardello C; Squasi PAM; Olivari Z JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 3(10):1126-1135. PubMed ID: 29759495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Ikeda A; Nakagawa H; Lambert H; Shah DC; Fonck E; Yulzari A; Sharma T; Pitha JV; Lazzara R; Jackman WM Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 7(6):1174-80. PubMed ID: 25381331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]