These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3388907)
1. [Some biometric problems of model search in multidimensional contingency table analysis]. Deutschmann C Z Gesamte Hyg; 1988 Mar; 34(3):192-4. PubMed ID: 3388907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An application of the clumped binomial model to the analysis of clustered attribute data. Koch GG; Tolley HD; Freeman JL Biometrics; 1976 Jun; 32(2):337-54. PubMed ID: 986196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Chi-square statistics based on block-triangular tables]. Agung IG Majalah Demografi Indones; 1986 Dec; 13(26):iv, 49-60. PubMed ID: 12314597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of response surface methodology from a biometric viewpoint. Mead R; Pike DJ Biometrics; 1975 Dec; 31(4):803-51. PubMed ID: 1106790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Classification of multidimensional contingency tables]. Victor N Biometrics; 1972 Jun; 28(2):427-41. PubMed ID: 5037864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [A model for analysis of symptom clusters in alternative symptoms]. Hansert E Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1973; 7():187-96. PubMed ID: 4533040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The relation between score tests and approximate UMPU tests in exponential models common in biometry. Gart JJ; Tarone RE Biometrics; 1983 Sep; 39(3):781-6. PubMed ID: 6652208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Choosing the best population development goal]. Chen Y; Liu J; Yu Q Renkou Yanjiu; 1985 Jul; (4):9-11. PubMed ID: 12159286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simple example of a comparison involving quantal data. Cox DR Biometrika; 1966 Jun; 53(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 5964059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mixed-effects variance components models for biometric family analyses. McArdle JJ; Prescott CA Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):631-52. PubMed ID: 16184490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative tests for comparing normal distribution parameters based on logistic regression. Mantel N; Brown C Biometrics; 1974 Sep; 30(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 4411927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Equivalence of maximum likelihood and the method of moments in probit analysis. Mantel N; Greenhouse SW Biometrics; 1967 Mar; 23(1):154-7. PubMed ID: 6050468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Biometry as a methodologic principle of clinical research in otorhinolaryngology]. Horbach L HNO; 1986 May; 34(5):177-85. PubMed ID: 3522501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A general maximum likelihood discriminant. Day NE; Kerridge DF Biometrics; 1967 Jun; 23(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 6051594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination between alternative binary response models. Chambers EA; Cox DR Biometrika; 1967 Dec; 54(3):573-8. PubMed ID: 6064019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategies for the selection of log-linear models. Benedetti JK; Brown MB Biometrics; 1978 Dec; 34(4):680-86. PubMed ID: 749951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Employment of time series theory in experimental medicine (author's transl)]. Mager PP Acta Histochem; 1974; 49(2):233-45. PubMed ID: 4214073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Testing for pairwise independence. Haber M Biometrics; 1986 Jun; 42(2):429-35. PubMed ID: 3741981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple method of resolution of a distribution into gaussian components. Bhattacharya CG Biometrics; 1967 Mar; 23(1):115-35. PubMed ID: 6050463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]