These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33889345)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of pulpotomized and composite-restored primary molars: Incremental versus bulk-fill techniques.
    Ghajari MF; Ghasemi A; Moradi AY; Sanjari K
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2020; 17(6):412-416. PubMed ID: 33889345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture Load of Molars Restored with Bulk-fill, Flowable Bulk-fill, and Conventional Resin Composite After Simulated Chewing.
    Guerra L; Ramos RQ; Linhares LA; Bernardon JK; Favero SS; César PF; Júnior SM
    Oper Dent; 2023 May; 48(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 36656317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study.
    Al-Nahedh HN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Apr; 22(4):342-348. PubMed ID: 34267000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Fracture Resistance of Restored Premolars with Novel Composite Materials: An In Vitro Study.
    Al-Ibraheemi ZA; Abdullah HA; Jawad NA; Haider J
    Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():5512708. PubMed ID: 34462637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite.
    Atalay C; Yazici AR; Horuztepe A; Nagas E; Ertan A; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(5):E131-E140. PubMed ID: 27352045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of thickness of cavity wall on fracture strength of pulpotomized primary molar teeth with class II amalgam restorations.
    Mazhari F; Gharaghahi M
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2008 Mar; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18328236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of novel restorative materials and retention slots on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth.
    Yasa B; Arslan H; Yasa E; Akcay M; Hatirli H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 25982519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Composite Resin and Restorative Technique on Polymerization Shrinkage Stress, Cuspal Strain and Fracture Load of Weakened Premolars.
    Martins LC; Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Soares CJ; Versluis A; Borges GA; Veríssimo C
    J Adhes Dent; 2020; 22(5):503-514. PubMed ID: 33073781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods.
    Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture Resistance and Marginal Adaptation of Capped and Uncapped Bulk-fill Resin-based Materials.
    Al-Nahedh HN; Alawami Z
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):E43-E56. PubMed ID: 31750801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interfacial Stress and Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill or Conventional Composite Resins to Dentin in Class II Restorations.
    Duarte JCL; Costa AR; Veríssimo C; Duarte RW; Calabrez Filho S; Spohr AM; Borges GA; Correr-Sobrinho L
    Braz Dent J; 2020; 31(5):532-539. PubMed ID: 33146338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural Integrity Evaluation of Large MOD Restorations Fabricated With a Bulk-Fill and a CAD/CAM Resin Composite Material.
    Papadopoulos C; Dionysopoulos D; Tolidis K; Kouros P; Koliniotou-Koumpia E; Tsitrou EA
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(3):312-321. PubMed ID: 30444690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of two different types of fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin.
    Khan SI; Anupama R; Deepalakshmi M; Kumar KS
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Apr; 15(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 23534017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effects of Various Restorative Techniques on the Fracture Resistance of Pulpotomized Permanent Premolars.
    Ghahramani Y; Shafiei F; Jowkar Z; Kazemian S
    Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():5590911. PubMed ID: 34046063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored with high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites in comparison to the incremental placement technique.
    Hegde V; Sali AV
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(5):360-364. PubMed ID: 29386787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incremental and Bulk-fill Techniques With Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Different Cavity Configurations.
    Han SH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):631-641. PubMed ID: 29630486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Primary Incisors Restored with Different Intracanal-Reinforcement Materials.
    Salama F; Abdelmegid F; Alhussain M; Muaddi H; AlMaflehi N; Alhowaish L
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2021; 13():507-512. PubMed ID: 34887683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.