156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33891784)
1. Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest.
Bulbul E; Ilki FY; Gultekin MH; Erozenci A; Tutar O; Citgez S; Tansu N; Onal B
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Jul; 75(7):e14264. PubMed ID: 33891784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The association between ureteral wall thickness and need for additional procedures after primary ureteroscopy in patients with ureteral stones above the iliac crest.
Bulbul E; Tutar O; Gultekin MH; Ilki Y; Citgez S; Onal B
Aktuelle Urol; 2023 Feb; 54(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 36473485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.
Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.
Guler Y; Erbin A; Kafkasli A; Ozmerdiven G
Urolithiasis; 2021 Feb; 49(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 32279108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics.
Galli R; Sighinolfi MC; Micali S; Martorana E; Rosa M; Mofferdin A; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Apr; 69(2):189-194. PubMed ID: 27768022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?
Elbaset MA; Taha DE; Anas M; Elghareeb A; Abouelkheir RT; Ashour R; Sheir KZ; Osman Y
World J Urol; 2024 Mar; 42(1):151. PubMed ID: 38478098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can shock wave lithotripsy lead to impaction of ureteral stones?
Akkas F; Sam E; Ayten A; Atar FA; Guner E
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2023 Feb; 75(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 33781025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ureteral Wall Thickness as a Preoperative Indicator of Impacted Stones in Patients With Ureteral Stones Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
Yoshida T; Inoue T; Omura N; Okada S; Hamamoto S; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():45-49. PubMed ID: 28499762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Zanetti G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of pretreatment Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of factors affecting stone-clearance post-shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a prospective study.
Elbaset MA; Elkarta A; Eraky A; Badawy M; Sheir KZ; Shokeir AA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Sep; 52(9):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 32297179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.
Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ureteral wall thickness at the impacted ureteral stone site: a critical predictor for success rates after SWL.
Sarica K; Kafkasli A; Yazici Ö; Çetinel AC; Demirkol MK; Tuncer M; Şahin C; Eryildirim B
Urolithiasis; 2015 Feb; 43(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 25417717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Storz Medical Lithotripsy Index Predicts Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteric Stones.
Keskin SK; Spencer M; Turney BW
Urol J; 2023 Jul; 20(4):203-207. PubMed ID: 37489026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noncontrast computed tomography can predict the outcome of shockwave lithotripsy via accurate stone measurement and abdominal fat distribution determination.
Geng JH; Tu HP; Shih PM; Shen JT; Jang MY; Wu WJ; Li CC; Chou YH; Juan YS
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 31(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 25600918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.
Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Chung DY; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY
Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Nov; 57(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 27847914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi.
Scotland KB; Safaee Ardekani G; Chan JYH; Paterson RF; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):661-666. PubMed ID: 30860394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
