These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33892946)

  • 1. Similar long-term survival after isolated bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: A propensity-matched analysis.
    Attia T; Yang Y; Svensson LG; Toth AJ; Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH; Johnston DR;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Nov; 164(5):1444-1455.e4. PubMed ID: 33892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
    JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
    Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
    McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH
    JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term outcomes of mitral valve replacement in dialysis patients: evidence from a nationwide database.
    Yang KJ; Fu HY; Chang CJ; Wang TC; Wang CH; Chou NK; Wu IH; Hsu RB; Huang SC; Yu HY; Chen YS; Chi NH
    Int J Surg; 2023 Dec; 109(12):3778-3787. PubMed ID: 37678297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valve-sparing root replacement versus composite valve graft root replacement: Analysis of more than 1500 patients from 2 aortic centers.
    Levine D; Patel P; Wang C; Pan C; Dong A; Leshnower B; Kurlansky P; Smith CR; Chen E; Takayama H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Sep; 168(3):770-780.e6. PubMed ID: 37245627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in patients <65 years old.
    Kaneko T; Aranki S; Javed Q; McGurk S; Shekar P; Davidson M; Cohn L
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 24079878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term outcomes of isolated mechanical versus bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement in different age groups of propensity-matched patients.
    Rokui S; Gottschalk B; Peng D; Groenewoud R; Ye J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jul; 66(1):. PubMed ID: 38936344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
    Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revisiting aortic valve prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years: 10 years results of the AUTHEARTVISIT study.
    Traxler D; Krotka P; Reichardt B; Copic D; Veraar C; Mildner M; Wendt R; Auer J; Mascherbauer J; Ankersmit HJ; Graf A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2024 Jan; 65(1):. PubMed ID: 37756697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve implantation increases risk of reoperation for structural valve deterioration.
    Urso S; Calderón P; Sadaba R; Mahillo I; Tuñón J; Aldamiz G; Fraile J
    J Card Surg; 2014 Jul; 29(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24773571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aortic valve replacement: choice between mechanical valves and bioprostheses.
    Silberman S; Oren A; Dotan M; Merin O; Fink D; Deeb M; Bitran D
    J Card Surg; 2008; 23(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 18462345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aortic biological valve prosthesis in patients younger than 65 years of age: transition to a flexible age limit?
    Niclauss L; von Segesser LK; Ferrari E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 16(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 23287588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mid-term follow-up in patients with Biocor porcine bioprostheses.
    Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G; Thiene G; Casarotto D
    Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Jun; 10(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 12044432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of warfarin on cardiac and cerebrovascular events following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A nationwide cohort study.
    Chang WT; Ho CH; Chang CL; Cheng BC; Wu NC; Chen ZC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 May; 159(5):1730-1739.e1. PubMed ID: 31208804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is early anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement?
    Sundt TM; Zehr KJ; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Mullany CJ; McGregor CG; Puga FJ; Orszulak TA; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 May; 129(5):1024-31. PubMed ID: 15867776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.