These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33893064)

  • 1. Does observational study on the effectiveness of the Twin Blocks overestimate or underestimate the results? A comparative analysis of retrospective samples versus randomized controlled trial.
    Mehyar L; Sandler J; Thiruvenkatachari B
    J World Fed Orthod; 2021 Jun; 10(2):43-48. PubMed ID: 33893064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Harrison JE; Worthington HV; O'Brien KD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Nov; (11):CD003452. PubMed ID: 24226169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth in children.
    Harrison JE; O'Brien KD; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD003452. PubMed ID: 17636724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One phase or two phase orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion ?
    Veitz-Keenan A; Liu N
    Evid Based Dent; 2019 Sep; 20(3):72-73. PubMed ID: 31562403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion?
    Veitz-Keenan A; Liu N
    Evid Based Dent; 2019 Jun; 20(2):56-57. PubMed ID: 31253968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early orthodontic treatment reduced incisal trauma in children with class II malocclusions.
    Kalha AS
    Evid Based Dent; 2014 Mar; 15(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 24763171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Sandler J; Murray A; Walsh T; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Evaluation of Twin Block Appliance and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance in Early Class II Malocclusion Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Radwan ES; Maher A; Montasser MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1111-1121. PubMed ID: 37073934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of the Twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 15947523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Sep; 124(3):234-43; quiz 339. PubMed ID: 12970656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Aug; 124(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 12923506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
    Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
    Mujagic M; Pandis N; Fleming PS; Katsaros C
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 32839142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects of Twin-block appliance.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 29(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 15926439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample.
    Toth LR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):597-609. PubMed ID: 10587592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study.
    Mahamad IK; Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(3):49-58. PubMed ID: 23094559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical effectiveness of the Twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16254470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of Twin Block, Andresen and removable appliances in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(4):26-31. PubMed ID: 1452055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.