These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33893064)

  • 21. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Appelbe P; Davies L; Connolly I; Mitchell L; Littlewood S; Mandall N; Lewis D; Sandler J; Hammond M; Chadwick S; O'Neill J; McDade C; Oskouei M; Thiruvenkatachari B; Read M; Robinson S; Birnie D; Murray A; Shaw I; Harradine N; Worthington H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 19409339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The stability of Class II correction with functional appliance therapy and orthodontic camouflage: A retrospective cohort study.
    Gill IS; Pandis N; Fleming PS
    Int Orthod; 2021 Mar; 19(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 33531277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early orthodontic treatment for Class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Woon SC; Thiruvenkatachari B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):28-52. PubMed ID: 28024779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The twin block appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion.
    Gill D; Sharma A; Naini F; Jones S
    Dent Update; 2005 Apr; 32(3):158-60, 163-4, 167-8. PubMed ID: 15881511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Patient compliance with Twin Block appliance during treatment of Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial on two check-up prescriptions.
    Frilund E; Sonesson M; Magnusson A
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 45(2):142-149. PubMed ID: 35968672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents:
    Campbell C; Millett D; Kelly N; Cooke M; Cronin M
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):202-208. PubMed ID: 31613144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The modified twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Dyer FM; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    J Orthod; 2001 Dec; 28(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 11709592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Twin Block appliance with acrylic capping does not have a significant inhibitory effect on lower incisor proclination.
    van der Plas MC; Janssen KI; Pandis N; Livas C
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Jul; 87(4):513-518. PubMed ID: 28128634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Effect of early treatment with the Twin-block appliance].
    Ma WS; Liu JM; Lu HY; Zuo YP; Dong FS
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Aug; 23(4):295-8. PubMed ID: 16178188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block appliance in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Khan MI; Neela PK; Unnisa N; Jaiswal AK; Ahmed N; Purkayastha A
    Med Pharm Rep; 2022 Apr; 95(2):191-196. PubMed ID: 35721032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of treatment timing on clinical and psychological outcomes with Twin Block therapy: A multicentre two-arm parallel randomised controlled trial.
    Mandall N; Littlewood S; Shah J; Watkinson S; Glossop S; Dugdale C; Curran E; Walsh T
    J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 50(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 36062574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mandibular propulsion appliance for adults with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    González Espinosa D; Santos M; Mendes SMDA; Normando D
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 31786599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term dentoskeletal changes of class II growing patients' treatment with the propulseur universal light appliance. A prospective controlled study.
    Migliorati M; Drago S; Calzolari C; Gallo F; Dalessandri D; Orsini A; Silvestrini-Biavati A
    Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Apr; 69(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 32181609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between Classic Twin-block and a Modified Clear Twin-block in Class II, Division 1 Malocclusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Golfeshan F; Soltani MK; Zohrei A; Poorolajal J
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1455-1462. PubMed ID: 30713173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples.
    Parkin NA; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 11395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Treatment of developing Class II Division 1 malocclusion with Jumper Twin Block.
    Hammad SM; Bashir ES; El-Bialy AA
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2012; 23(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 22873025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.