270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33893253)
1. Comparative Study of Antifungal Efficacy of Various Endodontic Irrigants with and without Clotrimazole in Extracted Teeth Inoculated with
Srinivasan S; Velusamy G; Munshi MAI; Radhakrishnan K; Tiwari RVC
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1325-1330. PubMed ID: 33893253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antifungal efficacy of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 17% EDTA with and without an antifungal agent.
Chandra SS; Miglani R; Srinivasan MR; Indira R
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):675-8. PubMed ID: 20307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro antifungal efficacy of four irrigants as a final rinse.
Ruff ML; McClanahan SB; Babel BS
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):331-3. PubMed ID: 16554205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Activity of Octenidine: An
Reddy NBN; Sridhar D; Rajkumar A; Murugesan S; Selvaraj K; Sankar S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Aug; 21(8):905-909. PubMed ID: 33568613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative antimicrobial analysis of various root canal irrigating solutions on endodontic pathogens: an in vitro study.
Misuriya A; Bhardwaj A; Bhardwaj A; Aggrawal S; Kumar PP; Gajjarepu S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Mar; 15(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 25095835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants.
Jeansonne MJ; White RR
J Endod; 1994 Jun; 20(6):276-8. PubMed ID: 7931023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative antifungal efficacy of light-activated disinfection and octenidine hydrochloride with contemporary endodontic irrigants.
Eldeniz AU; Guneser MB; Akbulut MB
Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Feb; 30(2):669-75. PubMed ID: 23884903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.
Oliveira DP; Barbizam JV; Trope M; Teixeira FB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):702-6. PubMed ID: 17368057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis, BioPure MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.
Arslan S; Ozbilge H; Kaya EG; Er O
Saudi Med J; 2011 May; 32(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 21556468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antibacterial Effect of Azadirachta indica (Neem) or Curcuma longa (Turmeric) against Enterococcus faecalis Compared with That of 5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine in vitro.
Joy Sinha D; D S Nandha K; Jaiswal N; Vasudeva A; Prabha Tyagi S; Pratap Singh U
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2017; 58(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 28724858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro comparison of antimicrobial effcacy of three root canal irrigants-BioPure MTAD, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as a final rinse against E. faecalis.
Agrawal V; Rao MR; Dhingra K; Gopal VR; Mohapatra A; Mohapatra A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Sep; 14(5):842-7. PubMed ID: 24685785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium hypochlorite and octenidine hydrochloride in vitro.
Tirali RE; Bodur H; Sipahi B; Sungurtekin E
Aust Endod J; 2013 Apr; 39(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 23551508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of chitosan and other endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.
Shenoi PR; Morey ES; Makade CS; Gunwal MK; Khode RT; Wanmali SS
Gen Dent; 2016; 64(5):60-3. PubMed ID: 27599284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antifungal Effectiveness of Various Intracanal Medicaments against
Srikumar GP; Kumar RS; Bardia S; Geojan NE; Nishad G; Bhagat P
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1042-1047. PubMed ID: 33568593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An
Singh M; Singh S; Salgar AR; Prathibha N; Chandrahari N; Swapna LA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jan; 20(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 31102393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of antifungal efficacy of QMix 2in1 as a final irrigant: An
Kalyoncuoglu E; Tunc ES; Ozer S; Keskin C; Bilgin K; Birinci A
Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 27811455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antifungal effects of root canal irrigants and medicaments. An update review.
Mohammadi Z; Shalavi S
N Y State Dent J; 2014; 80(5):58-63. PubMed ID: 25672081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EFFECTS OF ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS ON THE PLANKTONIC FORM OF ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS: A REVIEW.
Mohammadi Z
Niger J Med; 2015; 24(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 27487599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of the antimicrobial effect of three irrigant solutions (chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidinated MUMS).
Bidar M; Hooshiar S; Naderinasab M; Moazzami M; Orafaee H; Naghavi N; Jafarzadeh H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):436-9. PubMed ID: 23151688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants.
Kuruvilla JR; Kamath MP
J Endod; 1998 Jul; 24(7):472-6. PubMed ID: 9693573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
