These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3389419)

  • 21. Visual letter matching: hemispheric functioning or scanning biases?
    Fecteau JH; Enns JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(10):1412-28. PubMed ID: 15989933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Information processing in near peripheral vision.
    Williams LJ
    J Gen Psychol; 1984 Oct; 111(2ND Half):201-7. PubMed ID: 6512515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wider recognition in peripheral vision common to different subtypes of dyslexia.
    Lorusso ML; Facoetti A; Pesenti S; Cattaneo C; Molteni M; Geiger G
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(20):2413-24. PubMed ID: 15246756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of foveal load and visual context on peripheral letter recognition.
    Salvemini AV; Stewart AL; Purcell DG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1996 Aug; 92(3):309-21. PubMed ID: 8782427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision.
    Hess RF; Dakin SC
    Nature; 1997 Dec; 390(6660):602-4. PubMed ID: 9403687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects.
    Reynolds HN
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(4):523-40. PubMed ID: 8296925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.
    Lavidor M; Hayes A; Shillcock R; Ellis AW
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 14967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attention shift not memory averaging reduces foveal bias.
    Uddin MK; Kawabe T; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3301-6. PubMed ID: 16256825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Object categorization in visual periphery is modulated by delayed foveal noise.
    Ramezani F; Kheradpisheh SR; Thorpe SJ; Ghodrati M
    J Vis; 2019 Aug; 19(9):1. PubMed ID: 31369042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Voluntary control of attention near the fovea.
    Juola JF; Crouch T; Cocklin T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1987 Mar; 64(3):207-17. PubMed ID: 3604741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Early spatial attentional modulation of inputs to the fovea.
    Frey HP; Kelly SP; Lalor EC; Foxe JJ
    J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 30(13):4547-51. PubMed ID: 20357105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impairing the useful field of view in natural scenes: Tunnel vision versus general interference.
    Ringer RV; Throneburg Z; Johnson AP; Kramer AF; Loschky LC
    J Vis; 2016; 16(2):7. PubMed ID: 27050950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual processing of simultaneously presented peripheral and foveal stimuli.
    Dennis PM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Feb; 46(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 643477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Control of attention around the fovea.
    Juola JF; Bouwhius DG; Cooper EE; Warner CB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):125-41. PubMed ID: 1826307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When shape information from a foveal nontarget affects gap detection accuracy in a parafoveal target.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1989 Jan; 116(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 2926378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peripheral field stimulation suppresses flicker but not pattern detection in foveal targets.
    Marrocco RT; Carpenter MA; Wright SE; Doran RA
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Oct; 42(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 3684490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Processing of alphabetic information presented in the fovea or the periphery: functional visual field and cognitive load.
    Williams LJ; Lefton LA
    Perception; 1982; 10(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 7110878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of age and cognitive load on peripheral-detection performance.
    Savage SW; Spano LP; Bowers AR
    J Vis; 2019 Jan; 19(1):15. PubMed ID: 30677125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficient allocation of attentional sensitivity gain in visual cortex reduces foveal sensitivity in visual search.
    Walshe RC; Geisler WS
    Curr Biol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):26-36.e6. PubMed ID: 34706217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.