BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33894620)

  • 1. Four year evaluation of therapeutic hysteroscopy under procedural sedation in an outpatient clinic.
    Cornelissen LGH; Kortekaas JC; Schoot BC; van Vliet HAAM
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jun; 261():65-71. PubMed ID: 33894620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
    Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
    BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of resectoscopic operative hysteroscopy in a UK outpatient clinic using local anesthetic and traditional reusable equipment, with patient experiences and comparative cost analysis.
    Penketh RJ; Bruen EM; White J; Griffiths AN; Patwardhan A; Lindsay P; Hill S; Carolan-Rees G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):830-6. PubMed ID: 24681168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy (PROSECCO trial): A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    van der Meulen JF; Bongers MY; van der Zee LG; Leemans JC; Duijnhoven RG; de Leeuw RA; Overdijk LE; Radder CM; van der Voet LF; Smeets NAC; van Vliet HAAM; Hehenkamp WJK; Manger AP; Lim AC; Peters LW; Horree N; Briët JM; van der Steeg JW; Coppus SFPJ; Kok HS
    PLoS Med; 2023 Dec; 20(12):e1004323. PubMed ID: 38153958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The (cost) effectiveness of procedural sedation and analgesia versus general anaesthesia for hysteroscopic myomectomy, a multicentre randomised controlled trial: PROSECCO trial, a study protocol.
    van der Meulen JF; Bongers MY; Coppus SFPJ; Bosmans JE; Maessen JMC; Oude Rengerink K; Overdijk LE; Radder CM; van der Voet LF; Smeets NAC; van Vliet HAAM; Hehenkamp WJK; Manger AP; Spaans WA; Bakkum EA; Horrée N; Briët JM; van der Steeg JW; Kok HS
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Mar; 19(1):46. PubMed ID: 30902087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carbon dioxide in office diagnostic hysteroscopy: An open question. A multicenter randomized trial on 1982 procedures.
    Tagliaferri V; Ricciardi L; Ricciardi R; Pinto LR; Lanzone A; Scambia G; Guido M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():97-101. PubMed ID: 30287097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Operative hysteroscopy in an office-based surgical setting: review of patient safety and satisfaction in 414 cases.
    Wortman M; Daggett A; Ball C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 23107759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and/or analgesia: advantages and limits.
    Litta P; Cosmi E; Saccardi C; Esposito C; Rui R; Ambrosini G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 18248873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Office diagnostic and operative hysteroscopy using local anesthesia only: an analysis of patient reported pain and other procedural outcomes.
    Keyhan S; Munro MG
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):791-8. PubMed ID: 24681061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective study of the use of the Myosure resectoscope to manage endometrial polyps in an outpatient setting.
    McIlwaine P; McElhinney B; Karthigasu KA; Hart R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Oct; 55(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 26259638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outpatient hysteroscopic removal of retained products of conception: evaluation of effectiveness, safety and patient satisfaction.
    Bailón Queiruga M; Olivé LM; Redol AC; Trigo CA; Betbesé EM; González MS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Nov; 290():123-127. PubMed ID: 37783140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conscious sedation for office hysteroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    De Silva PM; Carnegy A; Graham C; Smith PP; Clark TJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():89-98. PubMed ID: 34600190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence and intensity of pain during diagnostic hysteroscopy in women attending an infertility clinic: analysis of 489 cases.
    Pegoraro A; Santos ME; Takamori JT; Carvalho WAP; Oliveira R; Barbosa CP; van Nimwegen Â
    Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2020; 18():eAO4916. PubMed ID: 31851226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pain management for tubal sterilization by hysteroscopy.
    Kaneshiro B; Grimes DA; Lopez LM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Aug; (8):CD009251. PubMed ID: 22895987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation using the Hydro ThermAblator in an outpatient hysteroscopy clinic: feasibility and acceptability.
    Farrugia M; Hussain SY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 16698521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pain and Operative Technologies Used in Office Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    De Silva PM; Stevenson H; Smith PP; Clark TJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1699-1711. PubMed ID: 34089888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outpatient endometrial ablation: audit of outcomes and patient satisfaction.
    Ajmi A; Das S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Nov; 40(8):1145-1147. PubMed ID: 32013655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hysteroscopic tissue removal system (MyoSure) for the resection of polyps, sub-mucosal leiomyomas and retained products of conception in an out-patient setting: A single UK institution experience.
    Georgiou D; Tranoulis A; Jackson TL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Dec; 231():147-151. PubMed ID: 30388609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does temperature of distending medium matter in outpatient hysteroscopy? A double-blinded cohort control observational study of room temperature versus warmed saline.
    Kapur S; Gruber A; Sekar H; Mafuta J; Lodhi W; Sivashanmugarajan V; Yoong W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Mar; 46(3):485-489. PubMed ID: 31991520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. State-of-the-art flexible hysteroscopy for office gynecologic evaluation.
    Bradley LD; Widrich T
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1995 May; 2(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 9050568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.