These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33895241)

  • 1. Detection and analyzing plane of non-cavitated approximal caries by cross-polarized optical coherence tomography (CP-OCT).
    Xing H; Eckert GJ; Ando M
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103679. PubMed ID: 33895241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection ability and direction effect of photothermal-radiometry and modulated-luminescence for non-cavitated approximal caries.
    Xing H; Eckert GJ; Ando M
    J Dent; 2019 Nov; 90():103221. PubMed ID: 31678477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro performance of near infrared light transillumination at 780-nm and digital radiography for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries.
    Abogazalah N; Eckert GJ; Ando M
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():44-50. PubMed ID: 28559050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro visual and visible light transillumination methods for detection of natural non-cavitated approximal caries.
    Abogazalah N; Eckert GJ; Ando M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1287-1294. PubMed ID: 29987636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of angle on photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence (PTR/LUM) value.
    Xing H; Eckert GJ; Ando M
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104500. PubMed ID: 37015184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
    Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing potential early caries assessment methods for teledentistry.
    Van Hilsen Z; Jones RS
    BMC Oral Health; 2013 Mar; 13():16. PubMed ID: 23537067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grey levels and radiolucent lesion depth as cavity predictors for approximal dentin caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Mariath AA; Casagrande L; de Araujo FB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):377-81. PubMed ID: 17881594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring of simulated occlusal tooth wear by objective outcome measures.
    Alwadai GS; Roberts G; Ungar PS; González-Cabezas C; Lippert F; Diefenderfer KE; Eckert GJ; Hara AT
    J Dent; 2020 Nov; 102():103467. PubMed ID: 32916231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. OCT assessment of non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions by variation of incidence angle of probe light and refractive index matching.
    Park KJ; Haak R; Ziebolz D; Krause F; Schneider H
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():31-35. PubMed ID: 28479506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of the loci of non-cavitated fissure caries on its detection with optical coherence tomography.
    Zain E; Zakian CM; Chew HP
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():31-37. PubMed ID: 29378225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection accuracy of in vitro approximal caries by cone beam computed tomography images.
    Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):e24-7. PubMed ID: 20185260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of smooth surface caries in vitro.
    Nakagawa H; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Sumi Y
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 23084870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnosis of Occlusal Caries with Dynamic Slicing of 3D Optical Coherence Tomography Images.
    Luong MN; Shimada Y; Araki K; Yoshiyama M; Tagami J; Sadr A
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 32192069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative methods to visual and radiographic examinations for approximal caries detection.
    Abogazalah N; Ando M
    J Oral Sci; 2017 Sep; 59(3):315-322. PubMed ID: 28529280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging in vivo secondary caries and ex vivo dental biofilms using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography.
    Lenton P; Rudney J; Chen R; Fok A; Aparicio C; Jones RS
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 22578989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Different Contact Materials on Approximal Caries Detection by Laser Fluorescence and Light-Emitting Diode Devices.
    Ozsevik AS; Kararslan ES; Aktan AM; Bozdemir E; Cebe F; Sarı F
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Oct; 33(10):492-7. PubMed ID: 26352346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
    Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
    Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.