These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33895469)

  • 1. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated vehicles that communicate implicitly: examining the use of lateral position within the lane.
    Sripada A; Bazilinskyy P; de Winter J
    Ergonomics; 2021 Nov; 64(11):1416-1428. PubMed ID: 33950791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integration of automated vehicles in mixed traffic: Evaluating changes in performance of following human-driven vehicles.
    Mahdinia I; Mohammadnazar A; Arvin R; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar; 152():106006. PubMed ID: 33556655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What driving style makes pedestrians think a passing vehicle is driving automatically?
    Bazilinskyy P; Sakuma T; de Winter J
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103428. PubMed ID: 34020096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior.
    Jayaraman SK; Creech C; Tilbury DM; Yang XJ; Pradhan AK; Tsui KM; Robert LP
    Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():117. PubMed ID: 33501132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crash comparison of autonomous and conventional vehicles using pre-crash scenario typology.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Wu X; Glaser Y; He L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106281. PubMed ID: 34273622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deceleration parameters as implicit communication signals for pedestrians' crossing decisions and estimations of automated vehicle behaviour.
    Tian K; Tzigieras A; Wei C; Lee YM; Holmes C; Leonetti M; Merat N; Romano R; Markkula G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107173. PubMed ID: 37336051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1961-1976. PubMed ID: 37490722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections.
    Liu Q; Wang X; Liu S; Yu C; Glaser Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Feb; 195():107383. PubMed ID: 37984113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit intention communication as a design opportunity for automated vehicles: Understanding drivers' interpretation of vehicle trajectory at narrow passages.
    Miller L; Leitner J; Kraus J; Baumann M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106691. PubMed ID: 35667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.
    Rasch A; Panero G; Boda CN; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105494. PubMed ID: 32203729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space?
    Merat N; Louw T; Madigan R; Wilbrink M; Schieben A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():244-252. PubMed ID: 29615186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinematic cues in driver-pedestrian communication to support safe road crossing.
    Zach Noonan T; Gershon P; Domeyer J; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107236. PubMed ID: 37531855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operational design domain of automated vehicles at freeway entrance terminals.
    Ye X; Wang X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106776. PubMed ID: 35870304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety in higher level automated vehicles: Investigating edge cases in crashes of vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.
    Moradloo N; Mahdinia I; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107607. PubMed ID: 38723333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How would autonomous vehicles behave in real-world crash scenarios?
    Zhou R; Zhang G; Huang H; Wei Z; Zhou H; Jin J; Chang F; Chen J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107572. PubMed ID: 38657314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars.
    Dommes A; Merlhiot G; Lobjois R; Dang NT; Vienne F; Boulo J; Oliver AH; Crétual A; Cavallo V
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106256. PubMed ID: 34146938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106641. PubMed ID: 35390700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deriving functional safety (ISO 26262) S-parameters for vulnerable road users from national crash data.
    Krampe J; Junge M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105884. PubMed ID: 33360036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.