BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33895999)

  • 1. Profiles of juveniles with sex offense charges referred for competence evaluations.
    Cunningham KA; Edyburn KL; Lexcen F
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1829-1840. PubMed ID: 33895999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in the prevalence and impact of risk factors for general recidivism between different types of juveniles who have committed sexual offenses (JSOs) and juveniles who have committed nonsexual offenses (NSOs).
    van der Put CE; van Vugt ES; Stams GJ; Deković M; van der Laan PH
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Feb; 25(1):41-68. PubMed ID: 22786727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Juvenile sex offender re-arrest rates for sexual, violent nonsexual and property crimes: a 10-year follow-up.
    Waite D; Keller A; McGarvey EL; Wieckowski E; Pinkerton R; Brown GL
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Jul; 17(3):313-31. PubMed ID: 16121841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recidivism rates for registered and nonregistered juvenile sexual offenders.
    Letourneau EJ; Armstrong KS
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):393-408. PubMed ID: 18948430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults.
    Redlich AD; Silverman M; Steiner H
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):393-410. PubMed ID: 12808697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Juvenile offenders: competence to stand trial.
    Soulier M
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):837-54. PubMed ID: 23107566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of sex offender registration policies on juvenile justice decision making.
    Letourneau EJ; Bandyopadhyay D; Sinha D; Armstrong K
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Jun; 21(2):149-65. PubMed ID: 19141629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Juveniles who sexually offend: recommending a treatment program and level of care.
    Dwyer RG; Letourneau EJ
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):413-29. PubMed ID: 21683910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ten year research update (2001-2010): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
    Fogel MH; Schiffman W; Mumley D; Tillbrook C; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):165-91. PubMed ID: 23348511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual offense adjudication and sexual recidivism among juvenile offenders.
    Caldwell MF
    Sex Abuse; 2007 Jun; 19(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 17530405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of sexually violent person assessments of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses.
    Caldwell MF
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 23508828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of classification criteria for juvenile sex offenders.
    Kemper TS; Kistner JA
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):172-90. PubMed ID: 20406992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Insane Sex Offenders: Psychiatric and Legal Characteristics of Sexual Offenders Found Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity.
    Holoyda BJ; McDermott BE; Newman WJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1207-1214. PubMed ID: 29178452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The supreme court and the sentencing of juveniles in the United States: reaffirming the distinctiveness of youth.
    Siegel DM
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):431-45. PubMed ID: 21683911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Offender types and criminality dimensions in male juveniles convicted of sexual offenses.
    Aebi M; Vogt G; Plattner B; Steinhausen HC; Bessler C
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):265-88. PubMed ID: 21965467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Future orientation and competence to stand trial: the fragility of competence.
    Kivisto AJ; Moore TM; Fite PA; Seidner BG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(3):316-26. PubMed ID: 21908747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do Developmental and Life-Course Theory Risk Factors Equally Predict Age of Onset Among Juvenile Sexual and Nonsexual Offenders?
    Rosa M; Fox B; Jennings WG
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Feb; 32(1):55-78. PubMed ID: 30191769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Five year research update (1996-2000): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
    Mumley DL; Tillbrook CE; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):329-50. PubMed ID: 12808694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.