BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33896312)

  • 1. Meta-analysis of minimalist versus standard care approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Qureshi WT; Kundu A; Mir T; Khan A; Anwaruddin S; Sattar Y; Ogunsua A; Dutta A; Majeed CN; Walker J; Kakouros N
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Jun; 19(6):565-574. PubMed ID: 33896312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a minimalist approach.
    Gurevich S; Oestreich B; Kelly RF; Mbai M; Bertog S; Ringsred K; Lawton A; Thooft B; Wagner J; Garcia S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):192-195. PubMed ID: 28923694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose approach matter? A meta-analysis of outcomes following transfemoral versus transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Guo R; Xie M; Yim WY; Wu W; Jiang W; Wang Y; Hu X
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Jul; 21(1):358. PubMed ID: 34320946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Urgent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Under a Minimalist Strategy.
    Ichibori Y; Li J; Patel T; Lipinski J; Ladas T; Saric P; Kobe D; Tsushima T; Peters M; Patel S; Davis A; Markowitz AH; Bezerra HG; Costa MA; Kalra A; Attizzani GF
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 31(2):E30-E36. PubMed ID: 30700628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of local versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.
    Villablanca PA; Mohananey D; Nikolic K; Bangalore S; Slovut DP; Mathew V; Thourani VH; Rode's-Cabau J; Núñez-Gil IJ; Shah T; Gupta T; Briceno DF; Garcia MJ; Gutsche JT; Augoustides JG; Ramakrishna H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(2):330-342. PubMed ID: 28738447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors and Clinical Outcomes of Next-Day Discharge After Minimalist Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Kamioka N; Wells J; Keegan P; Lerakis S; Binongo J; Corrigan F; Condado J; Patel A; Forcillo J; Ogburn L; Dong A; Caughron H; Simone A; Leshnower B; Devireddy C; Mavromatis K; Guyton R; Stewart J; Thourani V; Block PC; Babaliaros V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29348004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in vascular complications and associated treatment strategies following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Ullery BW; Jin R; Kirker EB; Hayes G; Siwek L; Brevig J; Hodson RW; Spinelli KJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 72(4):1313-1324.e5. PubMed ID: 32169358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion.
    Gifft K; Brilakis E; Kumar A; Omran J; Enezate T
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Jun; 21(6):741-744. PubMed ID: 31706735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis.
    Carnero-Alcázar M; Maroto LC; Cobiella-Carnicer J; Vilacosta I; Nombela-Franco L; Alswies A; Villagrán-Medinilla E; Macaya C
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):644-652. PubMed ID: 28007879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety of shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Alkhalil A; Lamba H; Deo S; Bezerra HG; Patel SM; Markowitz A; Simon DI; Costa MA; Davis AC; Attizzani GF
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(2):345-353. PubMed ID: 28836345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safety and efficacy of minimalist approach in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the Optimized transCathEter vAlvular interventioN-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (OCEAN-TAVI) registry.
    Hosoba S; Yamamoto M; Shioda K; Sago M; Koyama Y; Shimura T; Kagase A; Tada N; Naganuma T; Araki M; Yamanaka F; Shirai S; Watanabe Y; Hayashida K
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Mar; 26(3):420-424. PubMed ID: 29096029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.
    Elbadawi A; Saad M; Elgendy IY; Barssoum K; Omer MA; Soliman A; Almahmoud MF; Ogunbayo GO; Mentias A; Gilani S; Jneid H; Aronow HD; Kleiman N; Abbott JD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(18):1811-1822. PubMed ID: 31537280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiovascular Outcomes with Transcatheter vs. Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Kundu A; Sardar P; Malhotra R; Qureshi WT; Kakouros N
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):453-460. PubMed ID: 31669113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes and readmissions after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis: A propensity matched analysis.
    Dhoble A; Bhise V; Nevah MI; Balan P; Nguyen TC; Estrera AL; Smalling RW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 91(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 28846185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Vancouver 3M (Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist) Clinical Pathway Facilitates Safe Next-Day Discharge Home at Low-, Medium-, and High-Volume Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Centers: The 3M TAVR Study.
    Wood DA; Lauck SB; Cairns JA; Humphries KH; Cook R; Welsh R; Leipsic J; Genereux P; Moss R; Jue J; Blanke P; Cheung A; Ye J; Dvir D; Umedaly H; Klein R; Rondi K; Poulter R; Stub D; Barbanti M; Fahmy P; Htun N; Murdoch D; Prakash R; Barker M; Nickel K; Thakkar J; Sathananthan J; Tyrell B; Al-Qoofi F; Velianou JL; Natarajan MK; Wijeysundera HC; Radhakrishnan S; Horlick E; Osten M; Buller C; Peterson M; Asgar A; Palisaitis D; Masson JB; Kodali S; Nazif T; Thourani V; Babaliaros VC; Cohen DJ; Park JE; Leon MB; Webb JG
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Mar; 12(5):459-469. PubMed ID: 30846085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in non-teaching hospitals.
    Ando T; Adegbala O; Villablanca PA; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Grines CL; Schreiber T; Nazif T; Kodali S; Afonso L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):954-962. PubMed ID: 30408309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of urgent versus nonurgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Elbadawi A; Elgendy IY; Mentias A; Saad M; Mohamed AH; Choudhry MW; Ogunbayo GO; Gilani S; Jneid H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):189-195. PubMed ID: 31647180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.
    Arora S; Strassle PD; Kolte D; Ramm CJ; Falk K; Jack G; Caranasos TG; Cavender MA; Rossi JS; Vavalle JP
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006929. PubMed ID: 30354596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in female in the United States.
    Ando T; Akintoye E; Telila T; Briasoulis A; Takagi H; Schreiber T; Afonso L; Grines CL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):813-819. PubMed ID: 28990736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: Evidence from a meta-analysis.
    Sardar P; Kundu A; Chatterjee S; Feldman DN; Owan T; Kakouros N; Nairooz R; Pape LA; Feldman T; Dawn Abbott J; Elmariah S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):504-515. PubMed ID: 28398671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.