These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33896748)

  • 1. Assessing the reporting quality of simulated patient studies in pharmacy research using a novel checklist (CRiSP).
    Amaratunge S; Harrison M; Perry D; Bond C; Ceulemans M; Foulon V; Clifford R; Seubert L
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2022 Feb; 18(2):2301-2307. PubMed ID: 33896748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A systematic review of the use of simulated patient methodology in pharmacy practice research from 2006 to 2016.
    Björnsdottir I; Granas AG; Bradley A; Norris P
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2020 Feb; 28(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 31397533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review.
    de Barra M; Scott C; Johnston M; De Bruin M; Scott N; Matheson C; Bond C; Watson M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e025511. PubMed ID: 31862736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing a checklist for reporting research using simulated patient methodology (CRiSP): a consensus study.
    Amaratunge S; Harrison M; Clifford R; Seubert L; Page A; Bond C
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2021 May; 29(3):218-227. PubMed ID: 33792718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do randomised controlled trials relevant to pharmacy meet best practice standards for quality conduct and reporting? A systematic review.
    Ritchie A; Seubert L; Clifford R; Perry D; Bond C
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2020 Jun; 28(3):220-232. PubMed ID: 31573121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting quality of survey research articles published in the pharmacy literature.
    Rybakov KN; Beckett R; Dilley I; Sheehan AH
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2020 Oct; 16(10):1354-1358. PubMed ID: 31980389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychometric properties of self-report concussion scales and checklists.
    McLeod TC; Leach C
    J Athl Train; 2012; 47(2):221-3. PubMed ID: 22488289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological considerations in clinical outcomes assessment of pharmacy-based minor ailments management: A systematic review.
    Paudyal V; Cunningham S; Gibson Smith K; MacLure K; Ryan C; Cordina M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205087. PubMed ID: 30286166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of AGREE and RIGHT: which Clinical Practice Guideline Reporting Checklist Should Be Followed by Guideline Developers?
    Yao X; Ma J; Wang Q; Kanters D; Ali MU; Florez ID
    J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Mar; 35(3):894-898. PubMed ID: 31713037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing content and factors influencing responses to information requests in community pharmacies in Jordan: A simulated patients study.
    Hammad EA; Al-Aqeel S; Elayah E; Jaber D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0264224. PubMed ID: 35180273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET).
    Phillips AC; Lewis LK; McEvoy MP; Galipeau J; Glasziou P; Moher D; Tilson JK; Williams MT
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):237. PubMed ID: 27599967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CJCheck Stage 1: development and testing of a checklist for reporting community juries - Delphi process and analysis of studies published in 1996-2015.
    Thomas R; Sims R; Degeling C; Street JM; Carter SM; Rychetnik L; Whitty JA; Wilson A; Ward P; Glasziou P
    Health Expect; 2017 Aug; 20(4):626-637. PubMed ID: 27704684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Topics and PRISMA Checklist Compliance for Meta-analyses in Dermatology: Journal Case Study.
    Poveda-Montoyo I; Belinchón-Romero I; Romero-Pérez D; Ramos-Rincón JM
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2019 Dec; 27(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 31969243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The CRESS checklist for reporting stability studies: on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).
    Cornes M; Simundic AM; Cadamuro J; Costelloe SJ; Baird G; Kristensen GBB; von Meyer A; Nybo M; Gómez Rioja R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Jul; 59(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 32710715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
    Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
    Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review.
    Grob ATM; van der Vaart LR; Withagen MIJ; van der Vaart CH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):451-457. PubMed ID: 28000958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Critical appraisal of simulated patient methodology to assess the practice of community pharmacist in the Middle East and North Africa region: A systematic review.
    Boura F; Al-Tabakha M; Hassan N; Darwich M
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2022; 20(3):2701. PubMed ID: 36733522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting quality of 2014-2018 clinical practice guidelines on diabetes according to the RIGHT checklist.
    Wang Q; Duan Y; Liang J; Chen Z; Chen J; Zheng Y; Chen Y; Tang C
    Endocrine; 2019 Sep; 65(3):531-541. PubMed ID: 31313224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical analysis of the reporting quality of randomized trials within Endodontics using the Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 quality standard checklist.
    Nagendrababu V; Jakovljevic A; Jacimovic J; Duncan HF; Jayaraman J; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2021 Jul; 54(7):1083-1104. PubMed ID: 33544911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.