BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33897069)

  • 41. Preprints in times of COVID19: the time is ripe for agreeing on terminology and good practices.
    Ravinetto R; Caillet C; Zaman MH; Singh JA; Guerin PJ; Ahmad A; Durán CE; Jesani A; Palmero A; Merson L; Horby PW; Bottieau E; Hoffmann T; Newton PN
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):106. PubMed ID: 34320970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. COVID-19 preVIEW: Semantic Search to Explore COVID-19 Research Preprints.
    Langnickel L; Baum R; Darms J; Madan S; Fluck J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():78-82. PubMed ID: 34042709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Preprint servers in lipidology: current status and future role.
    Perera SD; Muleta AD; Vlasschaert C; Hegele RA
    Curr Opin Lipidol; 2022 Apr; 33(2):120-125. PubMed ID: 34699388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Publication patterns' changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis.
    Aviv-Reuven S; Rosenfeld A
    Scientometrics; 2021; 126(8):6761-6784. PubMed ID: 34188333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development, implementation and impact of a new preprint solicitation process at
    Neiman M; Bagley RK; Paczesniak D; Singh-Shepherd S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jul; 288(1954):20211248. PubMed ID: 34256003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.
    Sarabipour S; Debat HJ; Emmott E; Burgess SJ; Schwessinger B; Hensel Z
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Feb; 17(2):e3000151. PubMed ID: 30789895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article.
    Fu DY; Hughey JJ
    Elife; 2019 Dec; 8():. PubMed ID: 31808742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The preprint debate: What are the issues?
    Teixeira da Silva JA
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2018 Apr; 74(2):162-164. PubMed ID: 29692484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Preprint Servers' Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations.
    Malicki M; Jeroncic A; Ter Riet G; Bouter LM; Ioannidis JPA; Goodman SN; Aalbersberg IJ
    JAMA; 2020 Nov; 324(18):1901-1903. PubMed ID: 33170231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Rxivist.org: Sorting biology preprints using social media and readership metrics.
    Abdill RJ; Blekhman R
    PLoS Biol; 2019 May; 17(5):e3000269. PubMed ID: 31112533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Should there be greater use of preprint servers for publishing reports of biomedical science?
    Chalmers I; Glasziou P
    F1000Res; 2016; 5():272. PubMed ID: 26998238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Research methodology and characteristics of journal articles with original data, preprint articles and registered clinical trial protocols about COVID-19.
    Fidahic M; Nujic D; Runjic R; Civljak M; Markotic F; Lovric Makaric Z; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):161. PubMed ID: 32571302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019.
    Malički M; Costello J; Alperin JP; Maggio LA
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2021 Jun; 31(2):020201. PubMed ID: 33927548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Peer reviewers equally critique theory, method, and writing, with limited effect on the final content of accepted manuscripts.
    Stephen D
    Scientometrics; 2022; 127(6):3413-3435. PubMed ID: 35431366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Credibility of preprints: an interdisciplinary survey of researchers.
    Soderberg CK; Errington TM; Nosek BA
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Oct; 7(10):201520. PubMed ID: 33204484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets.
    Fleerackers A; Riedlinger M; Moorhead L; Ahmed R; Alperin JP
    Health Commun; 2022 May; 37(6):726-738. PubMed ID: 33390033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19.
    Wang P; Tian D
    J Biosaf Biosecur; 2021 Jun; 3(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 33521590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Publishing in pandemic times: A bibliometric analysis of early medical publications on Kawasaki-like disease (MIS-C, PIMS-TS) related to SARS-CoV-2.
    Morand A; Urbina D; Giovannini-Chami L; Fabre A
    Arch Pediatr; 2021 Aug; 28(6):464-469. PubMed ID: 34140220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research.
    Kirkham J; Moher D
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():920. PubMed ID: 30079245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.