168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33899603)
1. Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Almufarrij I; Dillon H; Munro KJ
Trends Hear; 2021; 25():2331216521999563. PubMed ID: 33899603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does probe-tube verification of real-ear hearing aid amplification characteristics improve outcomes in adult hearing aid users? A protocol for a systematic review.
Almufarrij I; Munro KJ; Dillon H
BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e038113. PubMed ID: 32690533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Listening Preferences of New Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized, Mixed-Methods Clinical Trial of Initial Versus Real-Ear Fit.
Almufarrij I; Dillon H; Adams B; Greval A; Munro KJ
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231189596. PubMed ID: 37942535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kitterick PT; Smith SN; Lucas L
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):495-507. PubMed ID: 27232073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.
Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):721-729. PubMed ID: 30388942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of performance with hearing aid programmed to NAL-NL1 first-fit and optimized-fit.
Narayanan SE; Manjula P
Codas; 2021; 34(1):e20200310. PubMed ID: 34669764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children.
Chong FY; Jenstad LM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):600-608. PubMed ID: 29072542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
Barker F; Mackenzie E; Elliott L; Jones S; de Lusignan S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jul; (7):CD010342. PubMed ID: 25019297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital noise reduction hearing aids in adults.
Lakshmi MSK; Rout A; O'Donoghue CR
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Feb; 16(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 31502900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
Mueller HG
Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial-fit approach versus verified prescription: comparing self-perceived hearing aid benefit.
Abrams HB; Chisolm TH; McManus M; McArdle R
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):768-78. PubMed ID: 23169194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the outcome of fitting hearing aids to adults affected by whether an audiogram-based prescription formula is individually applied? A systematic review protocol.
Almufarrij I; Dillon H; Munro KJ
BMJ Open; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e045899. PubMed ID: 34341039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Johnson EE
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
