168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33899603)
21. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure.
Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Walters D; Levitt H
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):177-93. PubMed ID: 10890726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Systematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economical outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss.
Bruchhage KL; Leichtle A; Schönweiler R; Todt I; Baumgartner WD; Frenzel H; Wollenberg B
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Apr; 274(4):1797-1806. PubMed ID: 27796557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study.
Kelsall D; Lupo J; Biever A
Am J Otolaryngol; 2021; 42(1):102773. PubMed ID: 33161258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hearing Aid Benefit in Patients with Mild Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.
Johnson CE; Danhauer JL; Ellis BB; Jilla AM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):293-310. PubMed ID: 27115240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.
Aldaz G; Puria S; Leifer LJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):732-749. PubMed ID: 27718350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
Kim H; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Benefits of Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
Kokx-Ryan M; Cohen J; Cord MT; Walden TC; Makashay MJ; Sheffield BM; Brungart DS
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):838-55. PubMed ID: 26554489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids for adults with hearing loss: a systematic review protocol.
Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e011683. PubMed ID: 27789514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Plastic changes in speech perception in older adults with hearing impairment following hearing aid use: a systematic review.
Lavie L; Shechter Shvartzman L; Banai K
Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):975-983. PubMed ID: 34928753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Systematic review of middle ear implants: do they improve hearing as much as conventional hearing AIDS?
Tysome JR; Moorthy R; Lee A; Jiang D; O'Connor AF
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Dec; 31(9):1369-75. PubMed ID: 20479696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Desjardins JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Probe-tube microphone measures with very young infants: real ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real ear unaided response.
Westwood GF; Bamford JM
Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 7672475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Speech recognition with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear dual-microphone hearing instruments.
Pumford JM; Seewald RC; Scollie SD; Jenstad LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Jan; 11(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 10741354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A preliminary investigation into hearing aid fitting based on automated real-ear measurements integrated in the fitting software: test-retest reliability, matching accuracy and perceptual outcomes.
Denys S; Latzel M; Francart T; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 58(3):132-140. PubMed ID: 30513024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
