These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33899603)

  • 61. Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Korhonen P; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):465-79. PubMed ID: 19764167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Kawaguchi L; Wu YH; Miller C
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 28(3):572-582. PubMed ID: 31296020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement.
    Kim MB; Chung WH; Choi J; Hong SH; Cho YS; Park G; Lee S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 24687593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder Fitted with Hearing Aids Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Current Practice and Outcomes.
    Walker E; McCreery R; Spratford M; Roush P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):204-218. PubMed ID: 26967362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Efficacy of the active middle-ear implant in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Butler CL; Thavaneswaran P; Lee IH
    J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Jul; 127 Suppl 2():S8-16. PubMed ID: 23790515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effect of Hearing Aid Directionality and Remote Microphone on Speech Intelligibility in Complex Listening Situations.
    Wagener KC; Vormann M; Latzel M; Mülder HE
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804945. PubMed ID: 30322342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Using a Digital Language Processor to Quantify the Auditory Environment and the Effect of Hearing Aids for Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Klein KE; Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):279-291. PubMed ID: 29664722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.
    Cho YS; Park SY; Seol HY; Lim JH; Cho YS; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jun; 145(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 31095263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.
    Nelson PB; Perry TT; Gregan M; VanTasell D
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518798264. PubMed ID: 30191767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Effect of low-frequency hearing aid response on four measures of speech perception.
    Tecca JE; Goldstein DP
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 6706023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Cochlear implant combined with a linear frequency transposing hearing aid.
    Hua H; Johansson B; Jönsson R; Magnusson L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Oct; 23(9):722-32. PubMed ID: 23072964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The use of a miniature microphone in the ear canal for the verification of hearing aid performance.
    Harford ER
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(6):329-37. PubMed ID: 7439566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
    Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
    Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A Personal Sound Amplification Product Compared to a Basic Hearing Aid for Speech Intelligibility in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Choi JE; Kim J; Yoon SH; Hong SH; Moon IJ
    J Audiol Otol; 2020 Apr; 24(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 31842534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA; Dillon H; McDermott HJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.