159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33900058)
1. Hysterosalpingography using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for infertility patients.
Mattos LA; Sauer LJ; Blasbalg R; Petta CA; Pereira RM; Carvalho LFP
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2021 Jul; 25(3):403-411. PubMed ID: 33900058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture.
Duan N; Chen X; Yin Y; Wang Z; Chen R
Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):1001-1007. PubMed ID: 31684746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
Ma L; Wu G; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Wang J; Li L; Zhou W
J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.
Volondat M; Fontas E; Delotte J; Fatfouta I; Chevallier P; Chassang M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between X-ray-hysterosalpingography and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of the tubal patency in the cause of female infertility.
Pace C; Argirò R; Casadei L; Cesareni M; Orlacchio A
Radiol Med; 2022 Dec; 127(12):1373-1382. PubMed ID: 36167884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Infertility work-up: To what degree does laparoscopy change the management strategy based on hysterosalpingography findings?
Berker B; Şükür YE; Aytaç R; Atabekoğlu CS; Sönmezer M; Özmen B
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1785-90. PubMed ID: 26399775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
Winter L; Glücker T; Steimann S; Fröhlich JM; Steinbrich W; De Geyter C; Pegios W
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of hysterosalpingography after tubal surgery.
Letterie GS; Haggerty MF; Fellows DW
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 251(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 1386980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of diagnostic magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of fallopian tubal occlusion of female infertility: A meta-analysis.
Li YZ; Qiu J; Ma B; Li TG; Yi B; Hu YG; Lei JQ; Yang KH
Clin Imaging; 2021 Apr; 72():11-18. PubMed ID: 33197711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional and magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal patency-A comparative study.
Jagannathan D; Hithaya F
Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2019; 29(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 31367087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study.
De Felice C; Rech F; Marini A; Stagnitti A; Valente F; Cipolla V; Borgogni G; Meggiorini ML
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012; 39(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22675963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hysterosonosalpingography and hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal patency in infertility patients].
de Almeida I; Souza C; Reginatto F; Cunha Filho JS; Facin A; Freitas F; Lavic Y; Passos EP
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2000; 46(4):342-5. PubMed ID: 11175570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography and tubal ostial polyps in infertility patients.
Lee A; Ying YK; Novy MJ
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 9219120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of three dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography in diagnosing uterine anomalies.
Szkodziak P; Woźniak S; Czuczwar P; Paszkowski T; Milart P; Wozniakowska E; Szlichtyng W
Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 25011216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of infertility: a five years review. (FGAE, 2001 -5).
Kitilla T
Ethiop Med J; 2010 Oct; 48(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 21280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of fallopian tubes in infertile women].
Bacevac J; Ganović R
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(9-10):243-6. PubMed ID: 11928602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media.
Kahyaoglu S; Yumusak OH; Kahyaoglu I; Kucukbas GN; Esercan A; Tasci Y
J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hysterosalpingography findings of female partners of infertile couple attending fertility clinic at Lagos University Teaching Hospital.
Makwe CC; Ugwu AO; Sunmonu OH; Yusuf-Awesu SA; Ani-Ugwu NK; Olumakinwa OE
Pan Afr Med J; 2021; 40():223. PubMed ID: 35145585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radionuclide hysterosalpingography is not predictive in the diagnosis of infertility.
Lundberg S; Wramsby H; Bremmer S; Lundberg HJ; Asard PE
Fertil Steril; 1998 Feb; 69(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 9496331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
