These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33900214)
1. Comparison of Horizontal Corneal Diameter Measurements Using Orbscan IIz, OPD Scan III, and IOLMaster 700. Cruz S; Valenzuela F; Stoppel J; Maul E; Gibbons A Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Oct; 47(10):533-538. PubMed ID: 33900214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements. Kohnen T; Thomala MC; Cichocki M; Strenger A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1809-13. PubMed ID: 17081862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Horizontal corneal diameter measurements using the Orbscan IIz and Pentacam HR systems. Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Khodaman AR Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1460-4. PubMed ID: 24055904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and Agreement of Horizontal Corneal Diameter Measurements Between Scanning-Slit Topography, Dual Rotating Scheimpflug Camera With Placido Disc Tomography, Placido Disc Topography, and Optical Coherence Tomography. Namkung S; Boyle AB; Li Y; Gokul A; McGhee C; Ziaei M Cornea; 2022 Nov; 41(11):1392-1397. PubMed ID: 34935660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of white-to-white measurements obtained by Anterion AS-OCT versus three optical devices in refractive surgery candidates. Salouti R; Azizi A; Hashemian H; Khorrami-Nejad M; Alkhafaji Q; Salouti K; Ghoreyshi M; Hossein Nowroozzadeh M Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; ():11206721241281876. PubMed ID: 39223843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. Baumeister M; Terzi E; Ekici Y; Kohnen T J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 15030827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster. Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan IIz on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconus eyes. Quisling S; Sjoberg S; Zimmerman B; Goins K; Sutphin J Ophthalmology; 2006 Sep; 113(9):1629-32. PubMed ID: 16949447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Agreement of implantable collamer lens sizes using parameters from different devices. Nonpassopon M; Jongkhajornpong P; Phimpho P; Cheewaruangroj N; Lekhanont K; Chuckpaiwong V BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2022; 7(1):e000941. PubMed ID: 35372697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of non-contact methods for the measurement of central corneal thickness. Gorgun E; Yenerel NM; Dinc UA; Oncel B; Kucumen RB; Oral D; Ciftci F Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(5):400-7. PubMed ID: 21899245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Orbscan II topographer and the iTrace aberrometer for the measurements of keratometry and corneal diameter in myopic patients. Chen Y; Xia X BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():33. PubMed ID: 27029933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of keratometry measurements using the Pentacam HR, the Orbscan IIz, and the TMS-4 topographer. Tajbakhsh Z; Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Aghazadeh-Amiri M; Tabatabaee S; Zamani M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):539-46. PubMed ID: 23057566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeatability and agreement of white-to-white measurements between slit-scanning tomography, infrared biometry, dual rotating Scheimpflug camera/Placido disc tomography, and swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Buckenham Boyle A; Namkung S; Shew W; Gokul A; McGhee CNJ; Ziaei M PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254832. PubMed ID: 34270605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interchangeability among five devices that measure anterior eye distances. Domínguez-Vicent A; Pérez-Vives C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Albarrán-Diego C; Montés-Micó R Clin Exp Optom; 2015 May; 98(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 25786342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Eyemetrics and Orbscan automated method to determine horizontal corneal diameter. Venkataraman A; Mardi SK; Pillai S Indian J Ophthalmol; 2010; 58(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 20413925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adjustment formulae to improve the correlation of white-to-white measurement with direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus diameter by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Hashemian SJ; Mohebbi M; Yaseri M; Jafari ME; Nabili S; Hashemian SM; Hashemian MS J Curr Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 30(3):217-222. PubMed ID: 30197950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements taken with the Pentacam, Orbscan IIz and IOLMaster in myopic and emmetropic eyes. Utine CA; Altin F; Cakir H; Perente I Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 87(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 18778337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with a New Multifunctional Unit and Five Other Devices. Kim BY; Jun I Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):338-349. PubMed ID: 35766048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of horizontal corneal diameter measurements using Galilei, EyeSys and Orbscan II systems. Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Sep; 92(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 19681922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]