These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33901565)

  • 1. The presence of semantic content in a visual recognition memory task reduces the severity of neglect.
    Moreh E; Zohary E; Orlov T
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 157():107860. PubMed ID: 33901565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual memory in unilateral spatial neglect: immediate recall versus delayed recognition.
    Moreh E; Malkinson TS; Zohary E; Soroker N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 26(9):2155-70. PubMed ID: 24666125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual and Semantic Representations at Encoding Contribute to True and False Recognition of Objects.
    Naspi L; Hoffman P; Devereux B; Morcom AM
    J Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 41(40):8375-8389. PubMed ID: 34413205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The spatially asymmetric cost of memory load on visual perception: transient stimulus-centered neglect.
    Gozli DG; Wilson KE; Ferber S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):580-591. PubMed ID: 24041329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working Memory in Unilateral Spatial Neglect: Evidence for Impaired Binding of Object Identity and Object Location.
    Cohen-Dallal H; Soroker N; Pertzov Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 33(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 32985947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Component deficits of visual neglect: "Magnetic" attraction of attention vs. impaired spatial working memory.
    Toba MN; Rabuffetti M; Duret C; Pradat-Diehl P; Gainotti G; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():52-62. PubMed ID: 29203204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual working memory deficits following right brain damage.
    Ferber S; Ruppel J; Danckert J
    Brain Cogn; 2020 Jul; 142():105566. PubMed ID: 32402918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating mental transformations and visuo-spatial storage in working memory: evidence from representational neglect.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; Beschin N; Denis M
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):430-4. PubMed ID: 15948629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Right-sided representational neglect after left brain damage in a case without visuospatial working memory deficits.
    van Dijck JP; Gevers W; Lafosse C; Fias W
    Cortex; 2013 Oct; 49(9):2283-93. PubMed ID: 23643245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic influence on visual working memory of object identity and location.
    Hu R; Jacobs RA
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104891. PubMed ID: 34481197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transient perceptual neglect: visual working memory load affects conscious object processing.
    Emrich SM; Burianová H; Ferber S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):2968-82. PubMed ID: 21452935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispatial neglect and serial order in verbal working memory.
    Antoine S; Ranzini M; van Dijck JP; Slama H; Bonato M; Tousch A; Dewulf M; Bier JC; Gevers W
    J Neuropsychol; 2019 Jun; 13(2):272-288. PubMed ID: 29316244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ipsilesional deficit of selective attention in left homonymous hemianopia and left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Chokron S; Peyrin C; Perez C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 May; 128():305-314. PubMed ID: 29551364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rightward exogenous attentional shifts impair perceptual memory of spatial locations in patients with left unilateral spatial neglect.
    Saj A; Pierce J; Caroli A; Ronchi R; Thomasson M; Vuilleumier P
    Cortex; 2020 Jan; 122():187-197. PubMed ID: 31761271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispatial neglect reflected on visual memory.
    Luukkainen-Markkula R; Tarkka IM; Pitkänen K; Sivenius J; Hämäläinen H
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2011; 29(5):321-30. PubMed ID: 21697587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic and functional relationships among objects increase the capacity of visual working memory.
    O'Donnell RE; Clement A; Brockmole JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 29648871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for a workspace model of working memory from semantic implicit processing in neglect.
    Della Sala S; van der Meulen M; Bestelmeyer P; Logie RH
    J Neuropsychol; 2010 Sep; 4(Pt 2):147-66. PubMed ID: 20226121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pure representational neglect and navigational deficits in a case with preserved visuo-spatial working memory.
    Piccardi L; Bianchini F; Zompanti L; Guariglia C
    Neurocase; 2008; 14(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 18792838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous estimation procedure reveals the object-based, but not space-based, dependence of visual working memory representations.
    Sone H; Kang MS; Li AY; Tsubomi H; Fukuda K
    Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104579. PubMed ID: 33406461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the effects of perceptual complexity versus conceptual meaning on the object benefit in visual working memory.
    Thibeault AML; Stojanoski B; Emrich SM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):453-468. PubMed ID: 38291307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.