These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33901613)
1. Review Failure Index as the Opposite Reflection of the Retraction Rate. A Proposal for a New Journal Metric Index. Georgiadis GS; Argyriou C; Papanas N; Lazarides MK Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Aug; 75():e5-e7. PubMed ID: 33901613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific record: Class uncorrected errors as misconduct. Kamoun S; Zipfel C Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):173. PubMed ID: 26961649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spoof research paper is accepted by 157 journals. Hawkes N BMJ; 2013 Oct; 347():f5975. PubMed ID: 24096966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks. Madlock-Brown CR; Eichmann D Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Feb; 21(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 24668038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors. Allison DB; Brown AW; George BJ; Kaiser KA Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7588):27-9. PubMed ID: 26842041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Integrity and misconduct in biomedical research]. Schonhaut B L Rev Chil Pediatr; 2019 Apr; 90(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 31095239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse. Van Noorden R Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):200-201. PubMed ID: 32047304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and integrity include hearing both sides. Wylie DT Optometry; 2010 Sep; 81(9):429. PubMed ID: 20728819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific integrity. Responding to possible plagiarism. Long TC; Errami M; George AC; Sun Z; Garner HR Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1293-4. PubMed ID: 19265004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud. Farthing MJ Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Set up a 'self-retraction' system for honest errors. Fanelli D Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):415. PubMed ID: 27008933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Journal retractions in oncology: a bibliometric study. Pantziarka P; Meheus L Future Oncol; 2019 Nov; 15(31):3597-3608. PubMed ID: 31659916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Publish or perish in China. Qiu J Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor. Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In scientific publishing at the article level, effort matters more than journal impact factors: hard work and co-authors overshadow journal venue in acquiring citations. Winker K Bioessays; 2011 Jun; 33(6):400-2. PubMed ID: 21538415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions]. Maisonneuve H Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When things go wrong: correcting the scientific record. Pulverer B EMBO J; 2015 Oct; 34(20):2483-5. PubMed ID: 26467018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A withdrawn prepublication. Jefferson T Lancet; 2007 Mar; 369(9565):901-2. PubMed ID: 17368139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned. Adam D; Knight J Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]