BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33901776)

  • 1. Impacted fetal head: A retrospective cohort study of emergency caesarean section.
    Cornthwaite K; Draycott T; Bahl R; Hotton E; Winter C; Lenguerrand E
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jun; 261():85-91. PubMed ID: 33901776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impacted foetal head at caesarean section: a national survey of practice and training.
    Cornthwaite K; Bahl R; Lenguerrand E; Winter C; Kingdom J; Draycott T
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 41(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 32723197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
    Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a novel birth simulator for impacted fetal head at cesarean section: An observational simulation study.
    Cornthwaite K; Draycott T; Winter C; Lenguerrand E; Hewitt P; Bahl R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Jan; 102(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 36349412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Managing an impacted fetal head at caesarean section: a UK survey of healthcare professionals and parents.
    Hanley SJ; Walker KF; Wakefield N; Plachcinski R; Pallotti P; Tempest N; Pillai A; Thornton J; Jones N; Mitchell EJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():88-92. PubMed ID: 35168126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
    Lenz F; Kimmich N; Zimmermann R; Kreft M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 30917799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of Impacted Fetal Head at Caesarean Birth: Scientific Impact Paper No. 73.
    Cornthwaite K; Bahl R; Winter C; Wright A; Kingdom J; Walker KF; Tydeman G; Briley A; Schmidt-Hansen M; Draycott T;
    BJOG; 2023 Nov; 130(12):e40-e64. PubMed ID: 37303275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend.
    Unterscheider J; McMenamin M; Cullinane F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 21470764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring full cervical dilatation caesarean sections-A retrospective cohort study.
    Corry EMA; Ramphul M; Rowan AM; Segurado R; Mahony RM; Keane DP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 May; 224():188-191. PubMed ID: 29614445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The acceptability and feasibility of a randomised trial exploring approaches to managing impacted fetal head during emergency caesarean section: a qualitative study.
    Romano G; Ayers S; Constantinou G; Mitchell EJ; Plachcinski R; Wakefield N; Walker KF
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Mar; 23(1):216. PubMed ID: 36991399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Training for managing impacted fetal head at caesarean birth: multimethod evaluation of a pilot.
    van der Scheer JW; Cornthwaite K; Hewitt P; Bahl R; Randall W; Powell A; Ansari A; Attal B; Willars J; Woodward M; Brown IAF; Olsson A; Richards N; Price E; Giusti A; Leeding J; Hinton L; Burt J; Dixon-Woods M; Maistrello G; Fahy N; Lyons O; ; Draycott T
    BMJ Open Qual; 2023 Jul; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 37524515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Caesarean section rates in subgroups of women and perinatal outcomes.
    Zhang J; Geerts C; Hukkelhoven C; Offerhaus P; Zwart J; de Jonge A
    BJOG; 2016 Apr; 123(5):754-61. PubMed ID: 26216434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases.
    Golfier F; Vaudoyer F; Ecochard R; Champion F; Audra P; Raudrant D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Oct; 98(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11574129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning From Experience: Development of a Cognitive Task List to Perform a Caesarean Section in the Second Stage of Labour.
    O'Brien S; Sharma K; Simpson A; Kingdom J; Windrim R; McAuliffe FM; Higgins M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2015 Dec; 37(12):1063-71. PubMed ID: 26637078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impacted foetal head at caesarean section: incidence and techniques used in a single UK institution.
    Rice A; Tydeman G; Briley A; Seed PT
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 39(7):948-951. PubMed ID: 31215269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour.
    Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Baskett TF
    BJOG; 2005 Jul; 112(7):986-90. PubMed ID: 15958005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of impacted fetal head at cesarean delivery.
    Cornthwaite KR; Bahl R; Lattey K; Draycott T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 230(3S):S980-S987. PubMed ID: 38462267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 'push method' with 'Patwardhan's method' on maternal and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing caesarean section in second stage.
    Keepanasseril A; Shaik N; Kubera NS; Adhisivam B; Maurya DK
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jul; 39(5):606-611. PubMed ID: 30917720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid-cavity instrumental delivery.
    Wang M; Kirby A; Gibbs E; Gidaszewski B; Khajehei M; Chua SC
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jun; 60(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 31514230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.