303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33902040)
41. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Evaluation of the electrode position by CBCT following cochlear implantation].
Fan XT; Wang N; Hou LX; Wang Z; Zhang H; Xu AT
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 54(8):566-570. PubMed ID: 31434368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of Insertion Forces and Cochlea Trauma Following Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion.
Kaufmann CR; Henslee AM; Claussen A; Hansen MR
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Jun; 41(5):631-638. PubMed ID: 32604327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Preliminary results and technique for electrophysiological intra-operative monitoring of residual hearing during cochlear implantation.
Harris R; Cruise A; Gibson W; Bate K; Sanli H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Nov; 12(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 22251808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Fluoroscopy guided electrode-array insertion for cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays: a valuable tool in most cases.
Perazzini C; Puechmaille M; Saroul N; Plainfossé O; Montrieul L; Bécaud J; Gilain L; Chabrot P; Boyer L; Mom T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Apr; 278(4):965-975. PubMed ID: 32588170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Radiological evaluation of a new straight electrode array compared to its precursors.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Speck I; Rauch AK; Beck R; Hassepass F
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3707-3714. PubMed ID: 33090276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
Cuda D; Murri A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Inroads toward robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery using steerable electrode arrays.
Zhang J; Wei W; Ding J; Roland JT; Manolidis S; Simaan N
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1199-206. PubMed ID: 20864880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. True keyhole cochlear implant surgery.
Abari J; Heuninck E; Al Saadi M; Topsakal V
Am J Otolaryngol; 2023; 44(4):103926. PubMed ID: 37229977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of Implantation and Reimplantation of Cochlear Implant Electrodes in an In Vivo Animal Experimental Model (Macaca fascicularis).
de Abajo J; Manrique-Huarte R; Sanhueza I; Alvarez-Gómez L; Zulueta-Santos C; Calavia D; Ramírez F; Manrique M
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e57-e68. PubMed ID: 27556522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cochlear Implant Electrode Array From Partial to Full Insertion in Non-Human Primate Model.
Manrique-Huarte R; Calavia D; Gallego MA; Manrique M
J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 29764773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Development of Automated Tool for Electrode Array Insertion and its Study on Intracochlear Pressure.
Zagabathuni A; Padi KK; Kameswaran M; Subramani K
Laryngoscope; 2024 Mar; 134(3):1388-1395. PubMed ID: 37584398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.
Carlson ML; Driscoll CL; Gifford RH; Service GJ; Tombers NM; Hughes-Borst BJ; Neff BA; Beatty CW
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):962-8. PubMed ID: 21659922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.
Beck RL; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Ketterer MC
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 38509805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Hearing preservation via a cochleostomy approach and deep insertion of a standard length cochlear implant electrode.
Bruce IA; Bates JE; Melling C; Mawman D; Green KM
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1444-7. PubMed ID: 22089957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Natural course of residual hearing preservation with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array.
Lee SY; Jeon H; Kim Y; Choi HY; Carandang M; Yoo HS; Choi BY
Am J Otolaryngol; 2022; 43(2):103382. PubMed ID: 35151931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes.
O'Connell BP; Hunter JB; Haynes DS; Holder JT; Dedmon MM; Noble JH; Dawant BM; Wanna GB
Laryngoscope; 2017 Oct; 127(10):2352-2357. PubMed ID: 28304096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of antioxidants and a vasodilator on overall safety and residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant patients.
Scheper V; Schmidtheisler M; Lasch F; von der Leyen H; Koch A; Schwieger J; Büchner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Trials; 2020 Jul; 21(1):643. PubMed ID: 32665006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
