303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33902040)
61. Hearing preservation after cochlear reimplantation.
Helbig S; Rajan GP; Stöver T; Lockley M; Kuthubutheen J; Green KM
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 23202149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. First Experience With a New Thin Lateral Wall Electrode in Human Temporal Bones.
Lenarz T; Avci E; Gazibegovic D; Salcher R
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Aug; 40(7):872-877. PubMed ID: 31058753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation.
Brown RF; Hullar TE; Cadieux JH; Chole RA
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1221-6. PubMed ID: 20818293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes.
Prentiss S; Sykes K; Staecker H
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 20211124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.
Campbell L; Kaicer A; Sly D; Iseli C; Wei B; Briggs R; O'Leary S
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 26859542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. In vitro accuracy evaluation of image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access.
Bell B; Gerber N; Williamson T; Gavaghan K; Wimmer W; Caversaccio M; Weber S
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 23921934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Short and long term preservation of hearing thresholds corrected for natural hearing loss in cochlear implant recipients using a straight electrode.
Snels CWM; Huinck WJ; Swinnen FKR; Dhooge I; Mylanus EAM
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Mar; 21(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 31648613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. A State-of-the-Art Method for Preserving Residual Hearing During Cochlear Implant Surgery.
Dietz A; Linder P; Iso-Mustajärvi M
J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37306464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.
Zou J; Lähelmä J; Koivisto J; Dhanasingh A; Jolly C; Aarnisalo A; Wolff J; Pyykkö I
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 May; 135(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 25675836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation.
Bester C; Dalbert A; Collins A; Razmovski T; Gerard JM; O'Leary S
Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):710-720. PubMed ID: 36550618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Preservation of Residual Hearing After Cochlear Implant Surgery With Deep Insertion Electrode Arrays.
Sierra C; Calderón M; Bárcena E; Tisaire A; Raboso E
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Apr; 40(4):e373-e380. PubMed ID: 30870358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Robotic assistance during cochlear implantation: the rationale for consistent, controlled speed of electrode array insertion.
Kashani RG; Henslee A; Nelson RF; Hansen MR
Front Neurol; 2024; 15():1335994. PubMed ID: 38318440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Hearing preservation with a slim modiolar cochlear implant in a pediatric cohort.
Jimenez JE; Govil N; Shaffer AD; Ledonne JC; Chi DH
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 140():110479. PubMed ID: 33190921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Durability of Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation with Conventional-Length Electrodes and Scala Tympani Insertion.
Sweeney AD; Hunter JB; Carlson ML; Rivas A; Bennett ML; Gifford RH; Noble JH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF; Wanna GB
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 May; 154(5):907-13. PubMed ID: 26908553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
