287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33902753)
1. How to engage patient partners in health service research: a scoping review protocol.
Tscherning SC; Bekker HL; Vedelø TW; Finderup J; Rodkjær LØ
Res Involv Engagem; 2021 Apr; 7(1):20. PubMed ID: 33902753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Models and frameworks of patient engagement in health services research: a scoping review protocol.
Chudyk AM; Waldman C; Horrill T; Demczuk L; Shimmin C; Stoddard R; Hickes S; Schultz ASH
Res Involv Engagem; 2018; 4():28. PubMed ID: 30214822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognizing patient partner contributions to health research: a mixed methods research protocol.
Fox G; Fergusson DA; Nicholls SG; Smith M; Stacey D; Lalu MM
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Jun; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 35668479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of patient, family, caregiver and public engagement in decision-making in healthcare systems: a scoping review protocol.
Hamilton C; Snow ME; Clark N; Gibson S; Dehnadi M; Lui M; Koster A; McLean J; Li LC
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e032788. PubMed ID: 31699750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protocol for a scoping review to map patient engagement in scoping reviews.
Oravec N; Monnin C; Gregora A; Bjorklund B; Dave MG; Schultz ASH; Chudyk AM
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Jun; 8(1):27. PubMed ID: 35725640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Newell S; Jordan Z
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.
Lauzon-Schnittka J; Audette-Chapdelaine S; Boutin D; Wilhelmy C; Auger AM; Brodeur M
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Oct; 8(1):55. PubMed ID: 36192817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework.
Daudt HM; van Mossel C; Scott SJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():48. PubMed ID: 23522333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supporting patient and public partners in writing lay summaries of scientific evidence in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.
Zarshenas S; Mosel J; Chui A; Seaton S; Singh H; Moroz S; Khan T; Colquhoun H
BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e062981. PubMed ID: 36517104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of social network analysis in health research: a scoping review protocol.
Grewal E; Godley J; Wheeler J; Tang KL
BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e078872. PubMed ID: 38803244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research.
Shahid A; Lalani IN; Rosgen BK; Sept BG; Longmore S; Parsons Leigh J; Stelfox HT; Fiest KM
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Dec; 8(1):72. PubMed ID: 36496455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Engaging patient and community stakeholders in the optimization of the Compassionate And Loving Mindset towards heart health risk (CALM Hearts) physical activity intervention: a description of initial work and protocol for future engagement activities.
Chudyk AM; Kullman S; Pool D; Duhamel TA; Ashe M; Strachan S
Res Involv Engagem; 2024 May; 10(1):42. PubMed ID: 38693591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient engagement in research related to dementia: A scoping review.
Bethell J; Commisso E; Rostad HM; Puts M; Babineau J; Grinbergs-Saull A; Wighton MB; Hammel J; Doyle E; Nadeau S; McGilton KS
Dementia (London); 2018 Nov; 17(8):944-975. PubMed ID: 30373460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research.
Bird M; Ouellette C; Whitmore C; Li L; Nair K; McGillion MH; Yost J; Banfield L; Campbell E; Carroll SL
Health Expect; 2020 Jun; 23(3):523-539. PubMed ID: 32157777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protocol for a scoping review study to identify and classify patient-centred quality indicators.
Jolley RJ; Lorenzetti DL; Manalili K; Lu M; Quan H; Santana MJ
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013632. PubMed ID: 28057655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protocol for co-producing a framework and integrated resource platform for engaging patients in laboratory-based research.
Lalu MM; Richards D; Foster M; French B; Crawley AM; Fiest KM; Hendrick K; Macala KF; Mendelson AA; Messner P; Nicholls SG; Presseau J; Séguin CA; Sullivan P; Thébaud B; Fergusson DA
Res Involv Engagem; 2024 Feb; 10(1):25. PubMed ID: 38347658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary health care in the Amazon and its potential impact on health inequities: a scoping review.
Sousa A; Herkrath FJ; Wallace C; Farmer J; Bousquat A
Rural Remote Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):6747. PubMed ID: 34973683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structured approaches to promote patient and family engagement in treatment in acute care hospital settings: protocol for a systematic scoping review.
Goodridge D; Henry C; Watson E; McDonald M; New L; Harrison EL; Scharf M; Penz E; Campbell S; Rotter T
Syst Rev; 2018 Feb; 7(1):35. PubMed ID: 29482622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Activities and impacts of patient engagement in CIHR SPOR funded research: a cross-sectional survey of academic researcher and patient partner experiences.
Chudyk AM; Stoddard R; McCleary N; Duhamel TA; Shimmin C; Hickes S; Schultz ASH
Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Aug; 8(1):44. PubMed ID: 36038887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
