These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33903985)

  • 1. Improved genomic prediction of clonal performance in sugarcane by exploiting non-additive genetic effects.
    Yadav S; Wei X; Joyce P; Atkin F; Deomano E; Sun Y; Nguyen LT; Ross EM; Cavallaro T; Aitken KS; Hayes BJ; Voss-Fels KP
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 Jul; 134(7):2235-2252. PubMed ID: 33903985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic prediction with machine learning in sugarcane, a complex highly polyploid clonally propagated crop with substantial non-additive variation for key traits.
    Chen C; Powell O; Dinglasan E; Ross EM; Yadav S; Wei X; Atkin F; Deomano E; Hayes BJ
    Plant Genome; 2023 Dec; 16(4):e20390. PubMed ID: 37728221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of genomic prediction of complex traits in sugarcane.
    Hayes BJ; Wei X; Joyce P; Atkin F; Deomano E; Yue J; Nguyen L; Ross EM; Cavallaro T; Aitken KS; Voss-Fels KP
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 May; 134(5):1455-1462. PubMed ID: 33590303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimising clonal performance in sugarcane: leveraging non-additive effects via mate-allocation strategies.
    Yadav S; Ross EM; Wei X; Powell O; Hivert V; Hickey LT; Atkin F; Deomano E; Aitken KS; Voss-Fels KP; Hayes BJ
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1260517. PubMed ID: 38023905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of continuous genotypes for genomic prediction in sugarcane.
    Yadav S; Ross EM; Wei X; Liu S; Nguyen LT; Powell O; Hickey LT; Deomano E; Atkin F; Voss-Fels KP; Hayes BJ
    Plant Genome; 2024 Mar; 17(1):e20417. PubMed ID: 38066702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strategies and considerations for implementing genomic selection to improve traits with additive and non-additive genetic architectures in sugarcane breeding.
    Voss-Fels KP; Wei X; Ross EM; Frisch M; Aitken KS; Cooper M; Hayes BJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 May; 134(5):1493-1511. PubMed ID: 33587151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic studies with preselected markers reveal dominance effects influencing growth traits in Eucalyptus nitens.
    Thumma BR; Joyce KR; Jacobs A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34791210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees.
    de Almeida Filho JE; Guimarães JFR; Fonsceca E Silva F; Vilela de Resende MD; Muñoz P; Kirst M; de Resende Júnior MFR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Aug; 9(8):2739-2748. PubMed ID: 31263059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
    Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.
    Da Y; Wang C; Wang S; Hu G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87666. PubMed ID: 24498162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental assessment of the accuracy of genomic selection in sugarcane.
    Gouy M; Rousselle Y; Bastianelli D; Lecomte P; Bonnal L; Roques D; Efile JC; Rocher S; Daugrois J; Toubi L; Nabeneza S; Hervouet C; Telismart H; Denis M; Thong-Chane A; Glaszmann JC; Hoarau JY; Nibouche S; Costet L
    Theor Appl Genet; 2013 Oct; 126(10):2575-86. PubMed ID: 23907359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
    Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits.
    Aliloo H; Pryce JE; González-Recio O; Cocks BG; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():8. PubMed ID: 26830030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic dissection of additive and non-additive genetic effects and genomic prediction in an open-pollinated family test of Japanese larch.
    Dong L; Xie Y; Zhang Y; Wang R; Sun X
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):11. PubMed ID: 38166605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomic prediction with non-additive effects in beef cattle: stability of variance component and genetic effect estimates against population size.
    Onogi A; Watanabe T; Ogino A; Kurogi K; Togashi K
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):512. PubMed ID: 34233617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Near-infrared spectroscopy outperforms genomics for predicting sugarcane feedstock quality traits.
    Gonçalves MTV; Morota G; Costa PMA; Vidigal PMP; Barbosa MHP; Peternelli LA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(3):e0236853. PubMed ID: 33661948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane.
    Islam MS; McCord PH; Olatoye MO; Qin L; Sood S; Lipka AE; Todd JR
    Plant Genome; 2021 Nov; 14(3):e20148. PubMed ID: 34510803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.
    Nazarian A; Gezan SA
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 26712858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A joint learning approach for genomic prediction in polyploid grasses.
    Aono AH; Ferreira RCU; Moraes ADCL; Lara LAC; Pimenta RJG; Costa EA; Pinto LR; Landell MGA; Santos MF; Jank L; Barrios SCL; do Valle CB; Chiari L; Garcia AAF; Kuroshu RM; Lorena AC; Gorjanc G; de Souza AP
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12499. PubMed ID: 35864135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.