123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33904057)
41. A novel nomogram for anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a retrospective study.
Li T; Huang J; Lei P; Yang X; Chen Z; Chen P; Zhai J; Guo X; Wei H
PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14437. PubMed ID: 36518266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. High stoma prevalence and stoma reversal complications following anterior resection for rectal cancer: a population-based multicentre study.
Holmgren K; Kverneng Hultberg D; Haapamäki MM; Matthiessen P; Rutegård J; Rutegård M
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 28612478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting operating time in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer.
Yuan W; Wang X; Wang Y; Wang H; Yan C; Song G; Liu C; Li A; Yang H; Gao C; Chen J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2023 Aug; 19(4):964-971. PubMed ID: 37675724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Current use of diverting stoma in anterior resection for cancer: population-based cohort study of total and partial mesorectal excision.
Rutegård M; Boström P; Haapamäki M; Matthiessen P; Rutegård J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Mar; 31(3):579-85. PubMed ID: 26670673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Clinical features and risk factors of surgical complications after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy].
Qin QY; Ma TH; Cai J; Huang XY; Wu YL; Wang HM; Wang H; Wang L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Dec; 56(12):892-899. PubMed ID: 30497115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.
Iwamoto M; Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):143. PubMed ID: 28764707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Nomogram to predict permanent stoma in rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving surgery.
Kuo CY; Wei PL; Chen CC; Lin YK; Kuo LJ
World J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Aug; 14(8):765-777. PubMed ID: 36157368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Lim SW; Huh JW; Kim YJ; Kim HR
World J Surg; 2011 Dec; 35(12):2811-7. PubMed ID: 21959930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer and Construction of a Nomogram Prediction Model.
Wang K; Li M; Liu R; Ji Y; Yan J
Cancer Manag Res; 2022; 14():2243-2252. PubMed ID: 35928989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Nomogram for predicting anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Hoshino N; Hida K; Sakai Y; Osada S; Idani H; Sato T; Takii Y; Bando H; Shiomi A; Saito N
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Apr; 33(4):411-418. PubMed ID: 29411120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A nomogram for predicting feasibility of laparoscopic anterior resection with trans-rectal specimen extraction (NOSES) in patients with upper rectal cancer.
Zhang ZY; Zhu Z; Zhang Y; Ni L; Lu B
BMC Surg; 2021 Jun; 21(1):296. PubMed ID: 34140016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Anastomotic leakage following restorative rectal cancer resection: treatment and impact on stoma presence 1 year after surgery-a population-based study.
Eriksen JD; Emmertsen KJ; Madsen AH; Iversen LH
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 37(5):1161-1172. PubMed ID: 35469107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Anterior resection for rectal cancer in Sweden: validation of a registry-based method to determine long-term stoma outcome.
Holmgren K; Haapamäki MM; Matthiessen P; Rutegård J; Rutegård M
Acta Oncol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 30306825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Risk factors of stoma re-creation after closure of diverting ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection or intersphincteric resection with loop ileostomy.
Song O; Kim KH; Lee SY; Kim CH; Kim YJ; Kim HR
Ann Surg Treat Res; 2018 Apr; 94(4):203-208. PubMed ID: 29629355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People's Republic of China.
Han JG; Wei GH; Gao ZG; Zheng Y; Wang ZJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 May; 52(5):950-7. PubMed ID: 19502861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Persistent Asymptomatic Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Can Diverting Stoma Be Reversed Safely at 6 Months?
Hain E; Maggiori L; Manceau G; Zappa M; Prost à la Denise J; Panis Y
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 May; 59(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 27050598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Permanent stoma rate and long-term stoma complications in laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a retrospective cohort study.
Burghgraef TA; Geitenbeek RTJ; Broekman M; Hol JC; Hompes R; Consten ECJ;
Surg Endosc; 2024 Jan; 38(1):105-115. PubMed ID: 37932600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. High risk of permanent stoma after anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Jutesten H; Draus J; Frey J; Neovius G; Lindmark G; Buchwald P; Lydrup ML
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Feb; 21(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 30411471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Establishment of a nomogram predicting risk factors of postoperative perineal wound complications after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer].
Lu SQ; Chang XF; Yang XD; Yu DC; Huang QG; Wang F
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 22(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 31054550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
