365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33904171)
1. Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system.
da Silva LM; Pereira EM; Salles PG; Godrich R; Ceballos R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Viret J; Chandarlapaty S; Ferreira CG; Ferrari B; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Reuter V; Dogdas B; DeMuth G; Sue J; Kanan C; Grady L; Fuchs TJ; Reis-Filho JS
J Pathol; 2021 Jun; 254(2):147-158. PubMed ID: 33904171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An independent assessment of an artificial intelligence system for prostate cancer detection shows strong diagnostic accuracy.
Perincheri S; Levi AW; Celli R; Gershkovich P; Rimm D; Morrow JS; Rothrock B; Raciti P; Klimstra D; Sinard J
Mod Pathol; 2021 Aug; 34(8):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 33782551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies.
Raciti P; Sue J; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Kapur S; Reuter V; Grady L; Kanan C; Klimstra DS; Fuchs TJ
Mod Pathol; 2020 Oct; 33(10):2058-2066. PubMed ID: 32393768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Pathology Diagnosis Demonstrates Significant Gains in Diagnostic Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection.
Raciti P; Sue J; Retamero JA; Ceballos R; Godrich R; Kunz JD; Casson A; Thiagarajan D; Ebrahimzadeh Z; Viret J; Lee D; Schüffler PJ; DeMuth G; Gulturk E; Kanan C; Rothrock B; Reis-Filho J; Klimstra DS; Reuter V; Fuchs TJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Oct; 147(10):1178-1185. PubMed ID: 36538386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial intelligence-assisted cancer diagnosis improves the efficiency of pathologists in prostatic biopsies.
Eloy C; Marques A; Pinto J; Pinheiro J; Campelos S; Curado M; Vale J; Polónia A
Virchows Arch; 2023 Mar; 482(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 36809483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Applications of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer histopathology.
Busby D; Grauer R; Pandav K; Khosla A; Jain P; Menon M; Haines GK; Cordon-Cardo C; Gorin MA; Tewari AK
Urol Oncol; 2024 Mar; 42(3):37-47. PubMed ID: 36639335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Hybrid Human-Machine Learning Approach for Screening Prostate Biopsies Can Improve Clinical Efficiency Without Compromising Diagnostic Accuracy.
Dov D; Assaad S; Syedibrahim A; Bell J; Huang J; Madden J; Bentley R; McCall S; Henao R; Carin L; Foo WC
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jun; 146(6):727-734. PubMed ID: 34591085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic effect of complete histologic sampling of prostate needle biopsy specimens.
Reyes AO; Humphrey PA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1998 Apr; 109(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 9535395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of A Computer-Aided Detection Software for Prostate Cancer Prediction: Excellent Diagnostic Accuracy Independent of Preanalytical Factors.
Vazzano J; Johansson D; Hu K; Eurén K; Elfwing S; Parwani A; Zhou M
Lab Invest; 2023 Dec; 103(12):100257. PubMed ID: 37813279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Deep Learning Approach to Diagnostic Classification of Prostate Cancer Using Pathology-Radiology Fusion.
Khosravi P; Lysandrou M; Eljalby M; Li Q; Kazemi E; Zisimopoulos P; Sigaras A; Brendel M; Barnes J; Ricketts C; Meleshko D; Yat A; McClure TD; Robinson BD; Sboner A; Elemento O; Chughtai B; Hajirasouliha I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Aug; 54(2):462-471. PubMed ID: 33719168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital Biopsy with Fluorescence Confocal Microscope for Effective Real-time Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Sandri M; Spandri V; Cimadamore A; Volavsek M; Mazzucchelli R; Lopez-Beltran A; Eissa A; Bertoni L; Azzoni P; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Puliatti S; Micali S; Paterlini M; Iseppi A; Rocco F; Pellacani G; Chester J; Bianchi G; Montironi R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):784-791. PubMed ID: 32952095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
