These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

742 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33904640)

  • 21. A comparative retrospective study of different surgical guide designs for static computer-assisted implant surgery in posterior single edentulous sites.
    De Souza AB; Kang M; Negreiros WM; El-Rafie K; Finkelman M; Papaspyridakos P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 34587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy Evaluation of the Computer-Designed Selective Laser Sintering Surgical Guide for Flapless Immediate Loading Dental Implants Surgery in Edentulous Jaws.
    de Almeida Prado Di Giacomo G; Cury P; da Silva AM; da Silva JVL; Pompeo Souto CE; Martines RT; Ajzen S
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Aug; 48(4):263-268. PubMed ID: 34091668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
    Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
    Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
    Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study.
    Takács A; Marada G; Turzó K; Nagy Á; Németh O; Mijiritsky E; Kivovics M; Mühl A
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):575. PubMed ID: 37596610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Open-sleeve templates for computer-assisted implant surgery at healed or extraction sockets: An in vitro comparison to closed-sleeve guided system and free-hand approach.
    Li J; Meneghetti PC; Galli M; Mendonca G; Chen Z; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jul; 33(7):757-767. PubMed ID: 35578783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery Using an Intraoral Scanner and Desktop 3D-Printed Tooth-Supported Guides.
    D'haese R; Vrombaut T; Hommez G; De Bruyn H; Vandeweghe S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):479-484. PubMed ID: 35727238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery.
    Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using Implant Studio and MGUIDE. An observational study.
    Fotopoulos I; Lillis T; Panagiotidou E; Kapagiannidis I; Nazaroglou I; Dabarakis N
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):249-256. PubMed ID: 35072419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Yimarj P; Subbalekha K; Dhanesuan K; Siriwatana K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):672-678. PubMed ID: 32939934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study.
    Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of template-based guided dental implant placement-An in vitro comparison of different manufacturing methods.
    Sium-Abel A; Keilig L; Dörsam I; Bourauel C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Aug; 35(8):864-875. PubMed ID: 38629760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The accuracy of a partially guided system using an in-office 3D-printed surgical guide for implant placement.
    Cho JY; Kim SB; Ryu J
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 34006060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deviation of dental implants placed using a novel 3D-printed surgical guide: An in vitro study.
    Etajuri EA; Suliman E; Mahmood WAA; Ibrahim N; Buzayan M; Mohd NR
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(4):359-362. PubMed ID: 33448161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-assisted bone augmentation, implant planning and placement: An in vitro investigation.
    Unger S; Benic GI; Ender A; Pasic P; Hämmerle CHF; Stadlinger B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):719-726. PubMed ID: 37248956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
    Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.