These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33905257)

  • 1. Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Baumann HM; Gapsys V; de Groot BL; Mobley DL
    J Phys Chem B; 2021 May; 125(17):4241-4261. PubMed ID: 33905257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.
    Gill SC; Lim NM; Grinaway PB; Rustenburg AS; Fass J; Ross GA; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 May; 122(21):5579-5598. PubMed ID: 29486559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Approaches for Relative Binding Free Energy Predictions.
    Wan S; Bhati AP; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Nov; 19(21):7846-7860. PubMed ID: 37862058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations for Buried Water Molecules.
    Ge Y; Baumann HM; Mobley DL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Nov; 18(11):6482-6499. PubMed ID: 36197451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying and Overcoming the Sampling Challenges in Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations of a Model Protein:Protein Complex.
    Zhang I; Rufa DA; Pulido I; Henry MM; Rosen LE; Hauser K; Singh S; Chodera JD
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):4863-4882. PubMed ID: 37450482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the Potential of Mean Force and Nonequilibrium Pulling Simulations by Simultaneous Alchemical Modifications.
    Reif MM; Zacharias M
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Jun; 18(6):3873-3893. PubMed ID: 35653503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addressing Suboptimal Poses in Nonequilibrium Alchemical Calculations.
    Karrenbrock M; Rizzi V; Procacci P; Gervasio FL
    J Phys Chem B; 2024 Feb; 128(7):1595-1605. PubMed ID: 38323915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.
    Huai Z; Yang H; Li X; Sun Z
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 33037549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alchemical Free Energy Calculations on Membrane-Associated Proteins.
    Papadourakis M; Sinenka H; Matricon P; Hénin J; Brannigan G; Pérez-Benito L; Pande V; van Vlijmen H; de Graaf C; Deflorian F; Tresadern G; Cecchini M; Cournia Z
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Nov; 19(21):7437-7458. PubMed ID: 37902715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.
    Lee TS; Allen BK; Giese TJ; Guo Z; Li P; Lin C; McGee TD; Pearlman DA; Radak BK; Tao Y; Tsai HC; Xu H; Sherman W; York DM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5595-5623. PubMed ID: 32936637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alchemical determination of drug-receptor binding free energy: Where we stand and where we could move to.
    Procacci P
    J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Jan; 71():233-241. PubMed ID: 27984798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery.
    Mobley DL; Klimovich PV
    J Chem Phys; 2012 Dec; 137(23):230901. PubMed ID: 23267463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
    Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Receptor-Ligand Restraint Schemes for Alchemical Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Clark F; Robb G; Cole DJ; Michel J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jun; 19(12):3686-3704. PubMed ID: 37285579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CHARMM-GUI Free Energy Calculator for Practical Ligand Binding Free Energy Simulations with AMBER.
    Zhang H; Kim S; Giese TJ; Lee TS; Lee J; York DM; Im W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Sep; 61(9):4145-4151. PubMed ID: 34521199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SAMPL9 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.
    Procacci P; Guarnieri G
    J Chem Phys; 2022 Apr; 156(16):164104. PubMed ID: 35490003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.
    Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining Alchemical Transformation with a Physical Pathway to Accelerate Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations of Charged Ligands to Enclosed Binding Sites.
    Cruz J; Wickstrom L; Yang D; Gallicchio E; Deng N
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Apr; 16(4):2803-2813. PubMed ID: 32101691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CHARMM-GUI Ligand Binder for absolute binding free energy calculations and its application.
    Jo S; Jiang W; Lee HS; Roux B; Im W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):267-77. PubMed ID: 23205773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.