BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33905498)

  • 1. Role of Sex-Concordant Gene Expression in the Coevolution of Exaggerated Male and Female Genitalia in a Beetle Group.
    Nomura S; Fujisawa T; Sota T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 38(9):3593-3605. PubMed ID: 33905498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolutionary changes in gene expression profiles associated with the coevolution of male and female genital parts among closely related ground beetle species.
    Nomura S; Sota T
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):637. PubMed ID: 36076166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic basis of species-specific genitalia reveals role in species diversification.
    Fujisawa T; Sasabe M; Nagata N; Takami Y; Sota T
    Sci Adv; 2019 Jun; 5(6):eaav9939. PubMed ID: 31249868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive Character Displacement in Genital Morphology in
    Nishimura T; Nagata N; Terada K; Xia T; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
    Am Nat; 2022 Mar; 199(3):E76-E90. PubMed ID: 35175894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Heterochrony and growth rate variation mediate the development of divergent genital morphologies in closely related Ohomopterus ground beetles.
    Terada K; Nishimura T; Hirayama A; Takami Y
    Evol Dev; 2021 Jan; 23(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 33245198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of two closely related ground beetle species with marked genital divergence using pyrosequencing.
    Fujimaki K; Fujisawa T; Yazawa S; Nishimura O; Sota T
    Zoolog Sci; 2014 Sep; 31(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25186930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
    Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Dec; 19(23):5231-9. PubMed ID: 21040054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of extremely large male genitalia under spatial limitation.
    Terada K; Furumoto C; Nishimura T; Hirayama A; Takami Y
    Evol Dev; 2024 Jun; ():e12488. PubMed ID: 38927009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Both male and female novel traits promote the correlated evolution of genitalia between the sexes in an arthropod.
    Tanabe T; Sota T
    Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):441-52. PubMed ID: 24116383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles.
    Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):385-91. PubMed ID: 17327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene expression during genital morphogenesis in the ground beetle Carabus maiyasanus.
    Nomura S; Fujisawa T; Sota T
    Insect Sci; 2020 Oct; 27(5):975-986. PubMed ID: 31318143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive isolation via divergent genital morphology due to cascade reinforcement in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
    Xia T; Nishimura T; Nagata N; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):169-182. PubMed ID: 36357996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental coevolution of male and female genital morphology.
    Simmons LW; Garcia-Gonzalez F
    Nat Commun; 2011 Jul; 2():374. PubMed ID: 21730955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How the length of genital parts affects copulation performance in a carabid beetle: implications for correlated genital evolution between the sexes.
    Okuzaki Y; Sota T
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Mar; 27(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 24471576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Female-driven intersexual coevolution in beetle genitalia.
    Genevcius BC; Baker J; Bianchi FM; Marvaldi AE
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jul; 33(7):957-965. PubMed ID: 32277841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of relative trait size and shape: insights from the genitalia of dung beetles.
    Parzer HF; David Polly P; Moczek AP
    Dev Genes Evol; 2018 Mar; 228(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 29423654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of sexually antagonistic genital morphologies on female reproduction and wild population demography.
    Takami Y; Fukuhara T; Yokoyama J; Kawata M
    Evolution; 2018 Nov; 72(11):2449-2461. PubMed ID: 30238547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coevolution of female and male genital components to avoid genital size mismatches in sexually dimorphic spiders.
    Lupše N; Cheng RC; Kuntner M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27535025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict.
    Brennan PL; Prum RO
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2015 Jul; 7(7):a017749. PubMed ID: 26134314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid divergent evolution of internal female genitalia and the coevolution of male genital morphology revealed by micro-computed tomography.
    Sloan NS; Harvey MS; Huey JA; Simmons LW
    Proc Biol Sci; 2024 Jan; 291(2015):20232883. PubMed ID: 38290544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.