253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33905960)
1. Effect of tissue microenvironment on fibrous capsule formation to biomaterial-coated implants.
Hernandez JL; Park J; Yao S; Blakney AK; Nguyen HV; Katz BH; Jensen JT; Woodrow KA
Biomaterials; 2021 Jun; 273():120806. PubMed ID: 33905960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Foreign body response to subcutaneous biomaterial implants in a mast cell-deficient Kit(w-Sh) murine model.
Avula MN; Rao AN; McGill LD; Grainger DW; Solzbacher F
Acta Biomater; 2014 May; 10(5):1856-63. PubMed ID: 24406200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomaterial Design Inspired by Regenerative Research Organisms.
Sapru S; Dill MN; Simmons CS
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2023 Jul; 9(7):3860-3876. PubMed ID: 36222692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bijel-templated implantable biomaterials for enhancing tissue integration and vascularization.
Thorson TJ; Gurlin RE; Botvinick EL; Mohraz A
Acta Biomater; 2019 Aug; 94():173-182. PubMed ID: 31233892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploring the Overlooked Roles and Mechanisms of Fibroblasts in the Foreign Body Response.
Parker JB; Griffin MF; Spielman AF; Wan DC; Longaker MT
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2023 Feb; 12(2):85-96. PubMed ID: 35819293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.
Junge K; Binnebösel M; von Trotha KT; Rosch R; Klinge U; Neumann UP; Lynen Jansen P
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2012 Feb; 397(2):255-70. PubMed ID: 21455703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Localized immunosuppressive environment in the foreign body response to implanted biomaterials.
Higgins DM; Basaraba RJ; Hohnbaum AC; Lee EJ; Grainger DW; Gonzalez-Juarrero M
Am J Pathol; 2009 Jul; 175(1):161-70. PubMed ID: 19528351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials.
Klopfleisch R; Jung F
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2017 Mar; 105(3):927-940. PubMed ID: 27813288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The foreign body response: emerging cell types and considerations for targeted therapeutics.
Yang B; Rutkowski N; Elisseeff J
Biomater Sci; 2023 Dec; 11(24):7730-7747. PubMed ID: 37904536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomaterial Encapsulation Is Enhanced in the Early Stages of the Foreign Body Reaction During Conditional Macrophage Depletion in Transgenic Macrophage Fas-Induced Apoptosis Mice.
Bank RA; Zandstra J; Room H; Petersen AH; van Putten SM
Tissue Eng Part A; 2017 Oct; 23(19-20):1078-1087. PubMed ID: 28090808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fibrin polymer on the surface of biomaterial implants drives the foreign body reaction.
Balabiyev A; Podolnikova NP; Kilbourne JA; Baluch DP; Lowry D; Zare A; Ros R; Flick MJ; Ugarova TP
Biomaterials; 2021 Oct; 277():121087. PubMed ID: 34478933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time course study of long-term biocompatibility and foreign body reaction to intraneural polyimide-based implants.
de la Oliva N; Navarro X; Del Valle J
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2018 Mar; 106(3):746-757. PubMed ID: 29052368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modulation of the foreign body response to implanted sensor models through device-based delivery of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, masitinib.
Avula MN; Rao AN; McGill LD; Grainger DW; Solzbacher F
Biomaterials; 2013 Dec; 34(38):9737-46. PubMed ID: 24060424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. T lymphocytes as critical mediators in tissue regeneration, fibrosis, and the foreign body response.
Adusei KM; Ngo TB; Sadtler K
Acta Biomater; 2021 Oct; 133():17-33. PubMed ID: 33905946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified foreign body reaction to silicone imbedded in subcutaneous tissues by different mouse systemic immune conditions.
Yamakawa T; Ichii O; Nakamura T; Namba T; Elewa YHA; Masum MA; Otani Y; Nishimura T; Kon Y
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2022 Dec; 110(12):1921-1931. PubMed ID: 35771065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of nitric oxide surface flux on the foreign body response to subcutaneous implants.
Nichols SP; Koh A; Brown NL; Rose MB; Sun B; Slomberg DL; Riccio DA; Klitzman B; Schoenfisch MH
Biomaterials; 2012 Sep; 33(27):6305-12. PubMed ID: 22748919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].
Zywicka B
Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Macrophage reaction against biomaterials in the mouse model - Phenotypes, functions and markers.
Klopfleisch R
Acta Biomater; 2016 Oct; 43():3-13. PubMed ID: 27395828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inflammation via myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 signaling mediates the fibrotic response to implantable synthetic poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.
Amer LD; Saleh LS; Walker C; Thomas S; Janssen WJ; Alper S; Bryant SJ
Acta Biomater; 2019 Dec; 100():105-117. PubMed ID: 31568879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Decoding the "Fingerprint" of Implant Materials: Insights into the Foreign Body Reaction.
Chen Y; Luo Z; Meng W; Liu K; Chen Q; Cai Y; Ding Z; Huang C; Zhou Z; Jiang M; Zhou L
Small; 2024 Jun; 20(23):e2310325. PubMed ID: 38191783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
