These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3390637)

  • 1. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 3390637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of fast-acting high-frequency compression on the intelligibility of speech in steady and fluctuating background sounds.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Wojtczak M; Gudgin E
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Aug; 31(4):257-73. PubMed ID: 9307821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect on the speech reception threshold in noise of the recovery time of the compressor in the high-frequency channel of a two-channel aid.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():82-91. PubMed ID: 8153569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Audiology; 1986; 25(4-5):210-26. PubMed ID: 3566630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Jun; 25(3):171-82. PubMed ID: 1873584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Design and evaluation of a two-channel compression hearing aid.
    Moore BC
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):181-92. PubMed ID: 3430376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Laurence RF; Wright D
    Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 4063555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid.
    Moore BC; Stainsby TH; Alcántara JI; Kühnel V
    Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(7):399-409. PubMed ID: 15515639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preferred listening levels for linear and slow-acting compression hearing aids.
    Neuman AC; Bakke MH; Hellman S; Levitt H
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):407-16. PubMed ID: 8549896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How much do we gain by gain control in hearing aids?
    Moore BC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():250-6. PubMed ID: 2192532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):400-11. PubMed ID: 9921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI; Launer S; Kuehnel V
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):365-74. PubMed ID: 11848178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.