These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study. Ms R; Riffelmann M; Kunze-Szikszay N; Lier M; Schmid O; Haus H; Schneider S; Jf H Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2021 Mar; 29(1):46. PubMed ID: 33706791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Vacuum Mattress versus the Spine Board Alone for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine Injured Patient: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. Prasarn ML; Hyldmo PK; Zdziarski LA; Loewy E; Dubose D; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1398-E1402. PubMed ID: 28591075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Could full-body digital X-ray (LODOX-Statscan) screening in trauma challenge conventional radiography? Deyle S; Wagner A; Benneker LM; Jeger V; Eggli S; Bonel HM; Zimmermann H; Exadaktylos AK J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 19204516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In search of the most suitable technique for truncal spinal immobilization with associated radiography. Schou J; Kiermayer H; Ummenhofer W; Herion HP Eur J Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 8(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 11436921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pressure distribution analysis of X-Ray table mattresses. Alresheedi N; Walton LA; Tootell A; Webb JA; Hogg P J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Mar; 52(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 33339756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of spinal immobilisation devices on radiation exposure in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Hemmes B; Jeukens CR; Kemerink GJ; Brink PR; Poeze M Emerg Radiol; 2016 Apr; 23(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26754428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans. Hemmes B; Jeukens CR; Al-Haidari A; Hofman PA; Vd Linden ES; Brink PR; Poeze M Emerg Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 27091739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A multipurpose vacuum mattress in health care]. Reisinger F; Bachratý M; Nádvorník P; Kolarík J Rozhl Chir; 1990 Sep; 69(9):619-21. PubMed ID: 2251600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic tube current modulation for whole-body polytrauma CT with immobilization devices: is there an increase in radiation dose and degradation of image quality? Euler A; Stieltjes B; Schindera ST Emerg Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 27614884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services. Nolte PC; Uzun DD; Häske D; Weerts J; Münzberg M; Rittmann A; Grützner PA; Kreinest M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2021 Jun; 47(3):719-726. PubMed ID: 31030223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation. Luscombe MD; Williams JL Emerg Med J; 2003 Sep; 20(5):476-8. PubMed ID: 12954698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board. Pernik MN; Seidel HH; Blalock RE; Burgess AR; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR; Prasarn ML Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1801-5. PubMed ID: 27324323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long backboard versus vacuum mattress splint to immobilize whole spine in trauma victims in the field: a randomized clinical trial. Mahshidfar B; Mofidi M; Yari AR; Mehrsorosh S Prehosp Disaster Med; 2013 Oct; 28(5):462-5. PubMed ID: 23746392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]