204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33906490)
1. The effect of reconstructive vaginal surgery on quality of life and sexual functions in postmenopausal women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse in intermediate-term follow-up.
Karaca SY
Post Reprod Health; 2021 Sep; 27(3):145-150. PubMed ID: 33906490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. McCall Culdoplasty vs. Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation after vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function in postmenopausal women.
Kokanalı MK; Cavkaytar S; Aksakal O; Doğanay M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Nov; 194():218-22. PubMed ID: 26448134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: Clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention.
Schiavi MC; Savone D; Di Mascio D; Di Tucci C; Perniola G; Zullo MA; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Apr; 223():113-118. PubMed ID: 29518641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse.
Colombo M; Milani R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9704759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. McCall Culdoplasty during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Till SR; Hobbs KA; Moulder JK; Steege JF; Siedhoff MT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(4):670-678. PubMed ID: 29128440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Novara L; Sgro LG; Pecchio S; Ottino L; Tomatis V; Biglia N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():278-281. PubMed ID: 31351324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study.
Spelzini F; Frigerio M; Manodoro S; Interdonato ML; Cesana MC; Verri D; Fumagalli C; Sicuri M; Nicoli E; Polizzi S; Milani R
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 27048368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of life and sexuality after bilateral sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse.
Yalcin Y; Demir Caltekin M; Eris Yalcin S
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2020 Sep; 12(3):206-210. PubMed ID: 32003546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-Term Experience with Modified McCall Culdoplasty in Women Undergoing Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bushra M; Anglim B; Al-Janabi A; Lovatsis D; Alarab M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Oct; 43(10):1129-1135. PubMed ID: 33984523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraperitoneal high vaginal cuff suspension at the time of vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse: Results of a modified McCall technique from a longitudinal clinical study.
Zilberlicht A; Dwyer PL; Karmakar D; Carswell F; Schierlitz L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 61(2):258-262. PubMed ID: 33346932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advanced uterovaginal prolapse: is vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty as effective as in lesser degrees of prolapse?
Alas A; Chandrasekaran N; Devakumar H; Martin L; Hurtado E; Davila GW
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 28779416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of McCall culdoplasty following vaginal hysterectomy in advanced stages of uterine prolapse.
Barber E; Kleiner I; Tairy D; Bar J; Ginath S
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2143-2148. PubMed ID: 34181067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Traditional McCall culdoplasty compared to a modified McCall technique with double ligament suspension: anatomical and clinical outcomes.
Parisi S; Novelli A; Olearo E; Basile A; Puppo A
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2147-2153. PubMed ID: 32594190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies.
Zhu Q; Shu H; Du G; Dai Z
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():40-43. PubMed ID: 29455045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. McCall culdoplasty vs. vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of advanced uterine prolapse: A randomized controlled study.
Karadag B; Mulayim B; Karadag C; Akdaş BA; Karataş S; Yüksel BA; Tatar SA
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 62(2):325-329. PubMed ID: 36965902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fixation of uterosacral ligaments to anterior vaginal wall during modified McCall culdoplasty after vaginal hysterectomy.
Mancarella M; Testa F; Chiadò Piat F; Novara L; Biglia N; Sgro LG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():221-226. PubMed ID: 35114574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation of the Vault during Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Dangal G; Poudel R; Shrestha R; Karki A; Pradhan HK; Bhattachan K; Bajracharya N
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Oct; 16(3):321-324. PubMed ID: 30455493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [UTEROSACRAL VERSUS SACROSPINOUS LIGAMENT FIXATION FOLLOWING VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE].
Nasser-Saman D; Yonis G; Haya N; Lavie O; Abramov Y
Harefuah; 2022 Jun; 161(6):342-348. PubMed ID: 35734789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse.
Şükür YE; Dökmeci F; Çetinkaya ŞE; Seval MM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():127-131. PubMed ID: 32092668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
