These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33906505)

  • 1. Trusting Automation: Designing for Responsivity and Resilience.
    Chiou EK; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2023 Feb; 65(1):137-165. PubMed ID: 33906505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trust in automation: integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust.
    Hoff KA; Bashir M
    Hum Factors; 2015 May; 57(3):407-34. PubMed ID: 25875432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From Here to Autonomy.
    Endsley MR
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 28146676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust Mediating Reliability-Reliance Relationship in Supervisory Control of Human-Swarm Interactions.
    Hussein A; Elsawah S; Abbass HA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1237-1248. PubMed ID: 31590574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From 'automation' to 'autonomy': the importance of trust repair in human-machine interaction.
    de Visser EJ; Pak R; Shaw TH
    Ergonomics; 2018 Oct; 61(10):1409-1427. PubMed ID: 29578376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems.
    Schaefer KE; Chen JY; Szalma JL; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):377-400. PubMed ID: 27005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cooperation in Human-Agent Systems to Support Resilience: A Microworld Experiment.
    Chiou EK; Lee JD
    Hum Factors; 2016 Sep; 58(6):846-63. PubMed ID: 27178676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affective processes in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM
    Hum Factors; 2011 Aug; 53(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 21901933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance.
    Lee JD; See KA
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):50-80. PubMed ID: 15151155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Providing different levels of accuracy about the reliability of automation to a human operator: impact on human performance.
    Avril E
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):217-226. PubMed ID: 35451925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Yamani Y; Handley HAH
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):333-345. PubMed ID: 28430544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars.
    Verberne FM; Ham J; Midden CJ
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 23156624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation.
    Muir BM; Moray N
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):429-60. PubMed ID: 8849495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who's the real expert here? Pedigree's unique bias on trust between human and automated advisers.
    Pearson CJ; Geden M; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102907. PubMed ID: 31422272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding Is Key: An Analysis of Factors Pertaining to Trust in a Real-World Automation System.
    Balfe N; Sharples S; Wilson JR
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):477-495. PubMed ID: 29613815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not all trust is created equal: dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions.
    Merritt SM; Ilgen DR
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):194-210. PubMed ID: 18516832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.