70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33906803)
1. Breast cancer detection: Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis across non-dense and dense breasts.
Hadadi I; Rae W; Clarke J; McEntee M; Ekpo E
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1027-1032. PubMed ID: 33906803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discordant and false-negative interpretations at digital breast tomosynthesis in the prospective Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (OTST) using independent double reading.
Skaane P; Østerås BH; Yanakiev S; Lie T; Eben EB; Gullien R; Brandal SHB
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jun; 34(6):3912-3923. PubMed ID: 37938385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiologists' performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection.
Trieu PDY; Noakes J; Li T; Borecky N; Brennan PC; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
Br J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 96(1145):20220704. PubMed ID: 36802348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility study comparing synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography for simulated first round screening in a single BreastScreen NSW centre.
Dhurandhar V; Bhola N; Chan M; Choi S; Chung TY; Giuffre B; Hunter N; Lee K; McKessar M; Reddy R; Roberts M; Shearman C; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Noakes J
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38698585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How long does it take to read a mammogram? Investigating the reading time of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
J W Partridge G; Darker I; J James J; Satchithananda K; Sharma N; Valencia A; Teh W; Khan H; Muscat E; J Michell M; Chen Y
Eur J Radiol; 2024 May; 177():111535. PubMed ID: 38852330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening Algorithms in Dense Breasts:
Berg WA; Rafferty EA; Friedewald SM; Hruska CB; Rahbar H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Feb; 216(2):275-294. PubMed ID: 32903054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Performance of Technologist-Performed Screening Breast Ultrasound After Tomosynthesis in Women With Dense Breasts (the DBTUST).
Berg WA; Zuley ML; Chang TS; Gizienski TA; Chough DM; Böhm-Vélez M; Sharek DE; Straka MR; Hakim CM; Hartman JY; Harnist KS; Tyma CS; Kelly AE; Waheed U; Houshmand G; Nair BE; Shinde DD; Lu AH; Bandos AI; Berg JM; Lettiere NB; Ganott MA
J Clin Oncol; 2023 May; 41(13):2403-2415. PubMed ID: 36626696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists.
Kim JG; Haslam B; Diab AR; Sakhare A; Grisot G; Lee H; Holt J; Lee CI; Lotter W; Sorensen AG
Radiol Artif Intell; 2024 Mar; 6(2):e230137. PubMed ID: 38323914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variations of image interpretations of radiologists from different populations in mammography and tomosynthesis with different levels of breast density.
Trieu PDY; Xiao Q; Gu Y; Lewis SJ; Barron ML; Tapia K; Brennan PC; Li T
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Mar; 10(2):025502. PubMed ID: 36992870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimising the diagnostic accuracy of First post-contrAst SubtracTed breast MRI (FAST MRI) through interpretation-training: a multicentre e-learning study, mapping the learning curve of NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) mammogram readers using an enriched dataset.
Jones LI; Marshall A; Geach R; Elangovan P; O'Flynn E; Timlin T; McKeown-Keegan S; Rose J; Vinnicombe S; Taylor-Phillips S; Halling-Brown M; Dunn JA;
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 May; 26(1):85. PubMed ID: 38807211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient Characteristics Impact Performance of AI Algorithm in Interpreting Negative Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Studies.
Nguyen DL; Ren Y; Jones TM; Thomas SM; Lo JY; Grimm LJ
Radiology; 2024 May; 311(2):e232286. PubMed ID: 38771177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D tomosynthesis evaluation of breast parenchymal density and its association with malignant lesions and menopausal status.
Pires T; Rohini A
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2024 Jun; 55(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 38402135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Added to Synthetic Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening in Brazil.
Couto HL; Gargano LP; de Oliveira VM; Coelho BA; Pessoa EC; Hassan AT; Silva AL; Urban LABD; Fernandes LC; Sharma N; Mann R; McIntosh SA; Zanghelini F
Pharmacoecon Open; 2024 May; 8(3):403-416. PubMed ID: 38233699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's Experiences with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Targeted Breast Ultrasound for Focal Breast Complaints: A Survey Study.
Siebers CCN; Appelman L; Appelman PTM; Go S; van Oirsouw MCJ; Broeders MJM; Mann RM
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2024 Apr; 33(4):499-501. PubMed ID: 38386779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast cancer detection: radiologists' performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound.
Kelly KM; Dean J; Lee SJ; Comulada WS
Eur Radiol; 2010 Nov; 20(11):2557-64. PubMed ID: 20632009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strengths and challenges of the artificial intelligence in the assessment of dense breasts.
Mansour S; Soliman S; Kansakar A; Marey A; Hunold C; Hanafy MM
BJR Open; 2022; 4(1):20220018. PubMed ID: 38525169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosythesis and breast MRI to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: patient tolerance and preference.
Savaridas SL; Whelehan P; Warwick VR; Vinnicombe SJ; Evans AJ
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20210779. PubMed ID: 35143334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography for suspicious findings in dense breasts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lin ST; Li HJ; Li YZ; Chen QQ; Ye JY; Lin S; Cai SQ; Sun JG
Cancer Med; 2024 Apr; 13(8):e7128. PubMed ID: 38659408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual adaptation to medical images: a comparison of digital mammography and tomosynthesis.
Parthasarathy MK; Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abbey CK; Webster MA
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 1):S11909. PubMed ID: 37114188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of the useful field of view for single slices of different imaging modalities and targets.
Lago MA; Sechopoulos I; Bochud FO; Eckstein MP
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 Mar; 7(2):022411. PubMed ID: 32064303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
