135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33907080)
1. Bacteria in Surgical Smoke: A Self-controlled Laboratory Study Using Porcine Spinal Tissues.
Zhu Z; Liu N; Xia W; Liu H; Wood KB; Wang K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Dec; 46(23):E1230-E1237. PubMed ID: 33907080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical smoke: still an underestimated health hazard in the operating theatre.
Kocher GJ; Sesia SB; Lopez-Hilfiker F; Schmid RA
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Apr; 55(4):626-631. PubMed ID: 30388210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The utility of local smoke evacuation in reducing surgical smoke exposure in spine surgery: a prospective self-controlled study.
Liu N; Filipp N; Wood KB
Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):166-173. PubMed ID: 31542472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamics of surgical smoke in the operating room during spinal surgery: Comparison of particulate matter 2.5-air concentration between the electric scalpel with and without a smoke evacuation pencil: A cross-sectional study.
Tanaka Y; Sawakami K; Shoji H; Segawa H; Ishikawa S; Kameyama H; Ohashi M; Watanabe K; Kawashima H
J Orthop Sci; 2023 Jul; 28(4):740-744. PubMed ID: 35585006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Efficient Smoke Evacuation Limit Aerosolization of Bacteria?
Schultz L
AORN J; 2015 Jul; 102(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 26119605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical smoke: modern mobile smoke evacuation systems improve occupational safety in the operating theatre.
Gioutsos K; Nguyen TL; Biber U; Enderle MD; Koss A; Kocher GJ
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2022 May; 34(5):775-782. PubMed ID: 35137083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical smoke.
Fan JK; Chan FS; Chu KM
Asian J Surg; 2009 Oct; 32(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 19892630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quantitative analysis of surgical smoke-derived particulate matter and formaldehyde exposure during spine surgery: a possible occupational hazard.
Choi SJ; Seo D; Ham CH; Kim JH; Kwon WK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Mar; 40(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 38100756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical smoke: A hidden killer in the operating room.
Zhou YZ; Wang CQ; Zhou MH; Li ZY; Chen D; Lian AL; Ma Y
Asian J Surg; 2023 Sep; 46(9):3447-3454. PubMed ID: 37002044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can we reduce the number of MRSA screening site swabs in elective orthopedic patients?
Ahmad A; Teoh KH; Lau L; Cheng N; Evans AR
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2019; 27(2):2309499019847068. PubMed ID: 31068084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical smoke - a health hazard in the operating theatre: a study to quantify exposure and a survey of the use of smoke extractor systems in UK plastic surgery units.
Hill DS; O'Neill JK; Powell RJ; Oliver DW
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Jul; 65(7):911-6. PubMed ID: 22445358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Dangers of Electrosurgical Smoke to Operating Room Personnel: A Review.
Bree K; Barnhill S; Rundell W
Workplace Health Saf; 2017 Nov; 65(11):517-526. PubMed ID: 28414627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).
Velbel MA; Cockell CS; Glavin DP; Marty B; Regberg AB; Smith AL; Tosca NJ; Wadhwa M; Kminek G; Meyer MA; Beaty DW; Carrier BL; Haltigin T; Hays LE; Agee CB; Busemann H; Cavalazzi B; Debaille V; Grady MM; Hauber E; Hutzler A; McCubbin FM; Pratt LM; Smith CL; Summons RE; Swindle TD; Tait KT; Udry A; Usui T; Westall F; Zorzano MP
Astrobiology; 2022 Jun; 22(S1):S112-S164. PubMed ID: 34904892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemical Components of Smoke Produced From Versatile Training Tissue Models Using Electrocautery.
Morimoto G; Kawahira H; Takayama S; Lefor AK
Simul Healthc; 2022 Feb; 17(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 34009917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Facepiece Respirators and Surgical Masks Against Surgical Smoke: Simulated Workplace Protection Factor Study.
Gao S; Koehler RH; Yermakov M; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jun; 60(5):608-18. PubMed ID: 26929204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical application effect of modified nasopharyngeal swab sampling for 2019 novel coronavirus nucleic acid detection].
Ma SY; Luo YM; Hu TY; You ZC; Sun JG; Yu SY; Yuan ZQ; Peng YZ; Luo GX; Xu Z
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 36(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 32268456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Human papillomavirus DNA in surgical smoke during cervical loop electrosurgical excision procedures and its impact on the surgeon.
Zhou Q; Hu X; Zhou J; Zhao M; Zhu X; Zhu X
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():3643-3654. PubMed ID: 31118787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-site and nasal swabbing for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: what does a single nose swab predict?
Young BC; Votintseva AA; Foster D; Godwin H; Miller RR; Anson LW; Walker AS; Peto TEA; Crook DW; Knox K
J Hosp Infect; 2017 Jul; 96(3):232-237. PubMed ID: 28246002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery.
Choi SH; Kwon TG; Chung SK; Kim TH
Surg Endosc; 2014 Aug; 28(8):2374-80. PubMed ID: 24570016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two non-invasive methods of microbial analysis in surgery practice: incision swabbing and the indirect imprint technique.
Chovanec Z; Veverkova L; Votava M; Svoboda J; Jedlicka V; Capov I
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Dec; 15(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 25478933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
