These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33907843)

  • 1. Accuracy of MRI for diagnosing pelvic and para‑aortic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer.
    Dezen T; Rossini RR; Spadin MD; Da Cunha Andrade CEM; Schimidt R; Vieira MA; Lima MA; De Andrade DAP; Dos Reis R
    Oncol Rep; 2021 Jun; 45(6):. PubMed ID: 33907843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk factors for paraaortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
    Sari ME; Yalcin İ; Sahin H; Meydanli MM; Gungor T
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 22(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28523533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preliminary report of using FDG-PET to detect extrapelvic lesions in cervical cancer patients with enlarged pelvic lymph nodes on MRI/CT.
    Tsai CS; Chang TC; Lai CH; Tsai CC; Ng KK; Hsueh S; Yen TC; Hong JH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1506-12. PubMed ID: 15050330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0T high-resolution MRI for assessment mesorectal lymph node metastases in patients with rectal cancer].
    Chen Y; Yang X; Lu B; Xiao X; Zhuang X; Yu S
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 21(7):786-792. PubMed ID: 30051447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer.
    Park JY; Kim EN; Kim DY; Suh DS; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 18201753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in differentiating between benign and metastatic lymph nodes in cases of cholangiocarcinoma.
    Promsorn J; Soontrapa W; Somsap K; Chamadol N; Limpawattana P; Harisinghani M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 30151713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combining tumor size and diffusion-weighted imaging to diagnose normal-sized metastatic pelvic lymph nodes in cervical cancers.
    Song J; Hu Q; Huang J; Ma Z; Chen T
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Mar; 60(3):388-395. PubMed ID: 29911401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The performance of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) and DWI-MRI in staging patients with cervical carcinoma according to the new FIGO classification (2018).
    Ninkova RV; Calabrese A; Curti F; Riccardi S; Gennarini M; Miceli V; Cupertino A; Di Donato V; Pernazza A; Rizzo SM; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Manganaro L
    Radiol Med; 2024 Jul; 129(7):1062-1075. PubMed ID: 38730037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors predictive of pelvic lymph node involvement and outcomes in melanoma patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node of the groin: A multicentre study.
    Mozzillo N; Pasquali S; Santinami M; Testori A; Di Marzo M; Crispo A; Patuzzo R; Verrecchia F; Botti G; Montella M; Rossi CR; Caracò C
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):823-9. PubMed ID: 25800935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer.
    Park W; Park YJ; Huh SJ; Kim BG; Bae DS; Lee J; Kim BH; Choi JY; Ahn YC; Lim DH
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 35(5):260-4. PubMed ID: 15886267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in assessing lymph node metastasis and myometrial invasion in patients with uterine cancer.
    Yoo SC; Kim WY; Yoon JH; Kim HY; Lee EJ; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Ryu HS
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 19480246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma.
    Yang WT; Lam WW; Yu MY; Cheung TH; Metreweli C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):759-66. PubMed ID: 10954463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging facilitates detection of metastases in normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes of patients with bladder and prostate cancer.
    Birkhäuser FD; Studer UE; Froehlich JM; Triantafyllou M; Bains LJ; Petralia G; Vermathen P; Fleischmann A; Thoeny HC
    Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):953-60. PubMed ID: 23916692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosing normal-sized pelvic lymph nodes metastases in patients with cervical cancer.
    Song Q; Yu Y; Zhang X; Zhu Y; Luo Y; Yu T; Sun J; Liu F; Dong Y
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Sep; 95(1138):20200203. PubMed ID: 33095657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of tumor histology on detection of pelvic and para-aortic nodal metastasis with
    Lin AJ; Wright JD; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Markovina S; Schwarz J; Thaker PH; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Grigsby PW
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1351-1354. PubMed ID: 31473660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pelvic lymph node status prediction in melanoma patients with inguinal lymph node metastasis.
    Pasquali S; Mocellin S; Bigolin F; Vecchiato A; Montesco MC; Di Maggio A; Rossi CR
    Melanoma Res; 2014 Oct; 24(5):462-7. PubMed ID: 24999756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound morphometric and cytologic preoperative assessment of inguinal lymph-node status in women with vulvar cancer: MorphoNode study.
    Garganese G; Fragomeni SM; Pasciuto T; Leombroni M; Moro F; Evangelista MT; Bove S; Gentileschi S; Tagliaferri L; Paris I; Inzani F; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Testa AC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):401-410. PubMed ID: 31237047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of pelvic lymph node metastasis in FIGO IB and IIA cervical cancer using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters.
    Kim SH; Cho SH
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2020 Sep; 26(5):382-389. PubMed ID: 32673204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes to predict pelvic lymphatic metastasis in cervical cancer: an integrated PET-IVIM MRI study.
    Xu C; Li X; Shi Y; Wang B; Sun H
    Cancer Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 32143736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lymph node assessment with (18)F-FDG-PET and MRI in uterine cervical cancer.
    Monteil J; Maubon A; Leobon S; Roux S; Marin B; Renaudie J; Genet D; Fermeaux V; Aubard Y; Tubiana-Mathieu N
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Nov; 31(11):3865-71. PubMed ID: 22110211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.