These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33909544)

  • 1. Incorporating the sample correlation into the testing of two endpoints in clinical trials.
    Sarkar S; Rom D; McTague J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2021 Jul; 31(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 33909544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trimmed weighted Simes' test for two one-sided hypotheses with arbitrarily correlated test statistics.
    Brannath W; Bretz F; Maurer W; Sarkar S
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):885-98. PubMed ID: 20014203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (II): sample size re-estimation.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2041-54. PubMed ID: 22733687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some statistical methods for multiple endpoints in clinical trials.
    Zhang J; Quan H; Ng J; Stepanavage ME
    Control Clin Trials; 1997 Jun; 18(3):204-21. PubMed ID: 9204221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Properties of multiple intersection-union tests for multiple endpoints in combination therapy trials.
    Westfall PH; Ho SY; Prillaman BA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(3):125-38. PubMed ID: 11725927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2027-40. PubMed ID: 22729929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size determination with familywise control of both type I and type II errors in clinical trials.
    Wang B; Ting N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(5):951-65. PubMed ID: 26881972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Truncated Simes tests.
    Lawrence J
    Biometrics; 2019 Dec; 75(4):1334-1344. PubMed ID: 31290137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the statistical power for multiple tests: a case study.
    Yeo A; Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 18381588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A parametric multiple test procedure to adaptive group-sequential trials allowing for mid-term modifications.
    Jin M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Mar; 90():105955. PubMed ID: 32028024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bonferroni-based correction factor for multiple, correlated endpoints.
    Shi Q; Pavey ES; Carter RE
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(4):300-9. PubMed ID: 22588983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculation for simulation-based multiple-testing procedures.
    Bang H; Jung SH; George SL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):957-67. PubMed ID: 16279354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weighted multiple hypothesis testing procedures.
    Kang G; Ye K; Liu N; Allison DB; Gao G
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article23. PubMed ID: 19409067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of multiplicity adjustment strategies for correlated binary endpoints.
    Leon AC; Heo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):839-55. PubMed ID: 16080237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of global tests on intersection hypotheses and their application in matched parallel gatekeeping procedures.
    Ouyang J; Zhang P; Carroll KJ; Lee J; Koch G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Jul; 30(4):593-606. PubMed ID: 31829826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity of the Hochberg procedure revisited for clinical trial applications.
    Huque MF
    Stat Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 26278421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Symmetric graphs for equally weighted tests, with application to the Hochberg procedure.
    Xi D; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(27):5268-5282. PubMed ID: 31657025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fallback procedure for evaluating a single family of hypotheses.
    Wiens BL; Dmitrienko A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 16279352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adding new experimental arms to randomised clinical trials: Impact on error rates.
    Choodari-Oskooei B; Bratton DJ; Gannon MR; Meade AM; Sydes MR; Parmar MK
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):273-284. PubMed ID: 32063029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A conditional error function approach for subgroup selection in adaptive clinical trials.
    Friede T; Parsons N; Stallard N
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4309-20. PubMed ID: 22865774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.